Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31621034›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2020

Trends in open abdomen management in Italy: a subgroup analysis from the IROA project.

Enrico Cicuttin, Luca Ansaloni, Marco Ceresoli, Paola Fugazzola, Matteo Tomasoni, Massimo Sartelli, Fausto Catena, Federico Coccolini, Italian IROA Study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrico CicuttinGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4584-9940
Luca AnsaloniGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
Marco CeresoliGeneral and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy.
Paola FugazzolaGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
Matteo TomasoniGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy.
Massimo SartelliGeneral and Emergency Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Fausto CatenaEmergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Federico CoccoliniGeneral, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini Hospital, Viale Giovanni Ghirotti, 286, 47521, Cesena, Italy. federico.coccolini@gmail.com.
Italian IROA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of open abdomen (OA) progressively acquired increasing importance with the diffusion of the damage control management of critical patients. The purpose of the present study is to identify the state of the art about the use of OA in Italy, focusing on techniques, critical issues and clinical outcomes. A prospective analysis of adult patients enrolled in the IROA, limited to the Italian participating centres was performed. 375 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 64 ± 16 years old, 56% of the patients were male, mean BMI was 26.9 ± 5.2. Main indications for using OA were secondary peritonitis (32.5%), post-operative peritonitis (22.9%) and trauma (11.7%). Main OA techniques used were commercial negative pressure wound therapy (49.6%) and Bogotà bag (27.7%). Definitive closure of the abdomen was reached in 82.4% of patients after 6 ± 7 days of OA. The primary fascia closure rate was 84.7%. Overall mortality was 29.1%. The complication rate was 50.8%, with an enteroatmospheric fistula incidence: 7.5%. A univariate analysis performed on complication type found the duration of OA treatment (p = 0.024) to be statistically significant. Univariate analysis on mortality risk identified as significant age, duration of OA (in days) and pancreatitis as indication; multivariate analysis confirmed age (p < 0.001) and pancreatitis (p = 0.002) as statistically significant. A large variety of behaviours towards the patient requiring OA exists. A strong acceptance of common, recognized and evidence-based guidelines is essential, to obtain more uniformity in patient management and coherence of collected data, thus leading to improvement in outcomes and reduction of costs.

Indexed as

AbdomenAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesAgedAge FactorsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyOpen Abdomen TechniquesPancreatitisPeritonitisPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesComplicationFistulaIROALaparostomyManagementMorbidityMortalityOpen abdomenPancreatitisPeritonitisRegisterTraumaVascular emergency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.