Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620999›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2020

Ticagrelor Removal by CytoSorb

Mehdi Javanbakht, Miranda Trevor, Mohsen Rezaei Hemami, Kazem Rahimi, Michael Branagan-Harris, Fabian Degener, Daniel Adam, Franziska Preissing, Jörg Scheier, Suzanne F Cook and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics and Other Drugs Removal by the CytoSorbAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. StandardizedFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Therapeutic Modulation of the Host Defense by Hemoadsorption with CytoSorbInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mehdi JavanbakhtOptimax Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, 20 Forth Banks Tower, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3PN, UK. HEOR@deviceaccess.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8661-8439
Miranda TrevorNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mohsen Rezaei HemamiPenTAG Health Technology Assessment, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Kazem RahimiThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael Branagan-HarrisDevice Access UK Ltd, Market Access Consultancy, University of Southampton Science Park, Chilworth Hampshire, UK.
Fabian DegenerCytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Daniel AdamCytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska PreissingCytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Jörg ScheierCytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Suzanne F CookCERobs Consulting LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Eric MortensenCytoSorbents Corporation, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA.

Funding

Cytosorbents 01/08/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute coronary syndrome patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy who need emergent or urgent cardiac surgery are at high risk of major bleeding, which can impair postoperative outcomes. CytoSorb

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the cost utility of intraoperative removal of ticagrelor using CytoSorb versus usual care among patients requiring emergent or urgent cardiac surgery in the UK.

methodsA de novo decision analytic model, based on current treatment pathways, was developed to estimate the short- and long-term costs and outcomes. Results from randomised clinical trials and national standard sources such as National Health Service (NHS) reference costs were used to inform the model. Costs were estimated from the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) explored the uncertainty surrounding the input parameters.

resultsIn emergent cardiac surgery, intraoperative removal of ticagrelor using CytoSorb was less costly (£12,933 vs. £16,874) and more effective (0.06201vs. 0.06091 quality-adjusted life-years) than cardiac surgery without physiologic clearance of ticagrelor over a 30-day time horizon. For urgent cardiac surgery, the use of CytoSorb was less costly than any of the three comparators-delaying surgery for natural washout without adjunctive therapy, adjunctive therapy with short-acting antiplatelet agents, or adjunctive therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin. Results from the PSAs showed that CytoSorb has a high probability of being cost saving (99% in emergent cardiac surgery and 53-77% in urgent cardiac surgery, depending on the comparators). Cost savings derive from fewer transfusions of blood products and re-thoracotomies, and shorter stay in the hospital/intensive care unit.

conclusionsThe implementation of CytoSorb as an intraoperative intervention for patients receiving ticagrelor undergoing emergent or urgent cardiac surgery is a cost-saving strategy, yielding improvement in perioperative and postoperative outcomes and decreased health resource use.

Identifiers

PMID31620999
PMCPMC7248150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.