ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2020
An Interpretable Algorithm on Post-injury Health Service Utilization Patterns to Predict Injury Outcomes.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of the Early Intervention Physiotherapist Framework for Injured Workers in Victoria, Australia: Data Analysis Follow-Up.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Review
- Musculoskeletal Disorders' Classification Proposal for Application in Occupational Medicine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Smart Work Injury Management (SWIM) System: Artificial Intelligence in Work Disability Management.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Machine Learning for Work Disability Prevention: Introduction to the Special Series.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Post-injury health service utilization (HSU) contributes to injury outcomes, but limited studies investigated their relationship. This study aims to group injured patients in transport accidents based on minimal historical information of their HSU so that the groups are meaningfully associated with the outcome of interest. Methods The data include 20,692 injured patients who had compensation claims over 3 years. We propose a hybrid approach, combining unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods. Based on the first week post-injury data, we identify a proper clustering of patients best associated with total cost to recovery, as well as the discovery of HSU patterns. This allows developing models to accurately predict the outcome of interest using the discovered patterns. Furthermore, we propose to use decision tree classifiers to accurately classify future patients into the discovered clusters using their first week post-injury information. Results Our hybrid approach has identified eight patient groups. The compactness of the resulted clusters, assessed by Average Silhouette Width metric, is 0.71 indicating well-defined clusters. The resulted patient groups are highly predictive of injury outcomes. They improve the cost predictability more than twice in comparison with predictors such as gender, age and injury type. These groups also have substantial association with patients' recovery. The transparency and interpretability of decision trees allow integrating the resulting classification rules conveniently in operational processes. Conclusions This study provides a framework to discover knowledge and useful insights for health service providers and policy makers to control injury outcomes, and consequently to reduce the severity of transport accidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31620997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.