Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620926›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2019

The Use of Social Media in Pediatric Urology-Forging New Paths or Crossing Boundaries?

Hong Truong, Andrew Salib, Courtney K Rowe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong TruongDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 1112, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. hong.truong@jefferson.edu.
Andrew SalibDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 1112, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Courtney K RoweDepartment of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 1112, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThere has been a remarkable change in how people connect, access, and share professional and medical information over social media. This perspective article describes opportunities, potential pitfalls, and guidelines for social media use by pediatric urology providers. RECENT

findingsPediatric urologists have effectively used social media to connect and share expertise, augment scientific conference participation, promote themselves and their research, disseminate guidelines and best practices, participate in virtual journal clubs, and engage with patients and their families. Information shared over social media is not protected by copyright law, not confidential, not regulated, permanent, and subjected to public domain and scrutiny. Despite these potential pitfalls, social media is a useful tool if best practices are observed and online communication adheres to professional guidelines and organizational policy. Social media use in healthcare is here to stay and pediatric urologists have online visibility whether or not they choose to actively participate. Despite new legal, ethical, and professional considerations that social media introduces, a well-executed social media presence provides pediatric urologists a wealth of new opportunities for networking, research, and disseminating high-quality medical information online.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPediatricsSocial MediaUrologyCongresses as TopicDelivery of Health CareGuidelines as TopicHumansInformation DisseminationMarketing of Health ServicesOnline Social NetworkingPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessionalismDigital mediaPediatric urologyProfessionalismSocial media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.