Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620913›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Esophagitis evolution after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass in consecutive cases.

Franco Signorini, Santiago Olguín, Germán Viscido, Lucio Obeide, Federico Moser

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. GASTROESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS: MISTAKES IN PERFORMING THE PROCEDURE?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franco Signorini *Bariatric Surgery Program, General Surgery Department, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Naciones Unidas 346, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina. fransign@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4616-9704
Santiago Olguín *Bariatric Surgery Program, General Surgery Department, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Naciones Unidas 346, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina.
Germán ViscidoBariatric Surgery Program, General Surgery Department, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Naciones Unidas 346, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina.
Lucio ObeideBariatric Surgery Program, General Surgery Department, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Naciones Unidas 346, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina.
Federico MoserBariatric Surgery Program, General Surgery Department, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Naciones Unidas 346, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina.
Hospital Privado · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErosive esophagitis (EE) is related to esophageal mucosal damage caused by GERD and is implicated in the development of Barret´s esophagus and adenocarcinoma, which incidence is rising in association with obesity. It is known that the correlation between symptoms and endoscopic findings is relatively poor, with a predictive value of only 40%. The objective of this study is to report the incidence of EE 1 year after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and gastric bypass (GBP) in consecutive patients in order to obtain an objective parameter of the impact of the two most popular bariatric procedures on esophageal mucosa.

methodsA retrospective review of a prospective database including every primary GBP and SG consecutive cases performed between January 2014 and December 2016. Esophagitis evolution was compared between patients with adequate weight loss versus those with inadequate weight loss. The comparison of baseline and 1-year EE, BMI, %EWL, and %TWL was made by using the Chi square test for categorical variables and Student "t" test for continuous samples.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-seven patients were included. GBP was performed to 35.2% (n = 80) and SG to 64.8% (n = 147). Pre- and postoperatively EE evolution in GBP decreased from 54 to 26.2% (p = 0.002) and in SG increased from 8.2 to 30% (p = 0.04) Barret´s esophagus in GBP decreased from 7.5 to 5% (p = 0.001). No statistical difference was observed when we compared the evolution of EE in patients with adequate or inadequate weight loss in both groups.

conclusionsThe incidence of EE 1 year after SG is greater than GBP. Moreover, not only GBP seems to improve this condition, but also SG tends to worsen EE. These results are to be associated with GERD disease.

Indexed as

AdultEsophagitisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyGastric BypassHernia, HiatalHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesWeight LossBariatric surgeryEsophagitisGastric bypassGERDRefluxSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID31620913
OpenAlexW2980897847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.