Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620843›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2019

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of liver lesions in children.

Alexander M El-Ali, James C Davis, Jennifer M Cickelli, Judy H Squires

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander M El-AliDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James C DavisDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jennifer M CickelliDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 4401 Penn Ave., 2nd Floor Radiology, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
Judy H SquiresDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. judy.squires@chp.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1237-3504

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial pediatric imaging of the liver heavily relies on ultrasonography (US) because it is free of ionizing radiation, easily portable and readily available. Although conventional US (gray-scale and color Doppler) is often an excellent screening tool, its relative low specificity compared to CT/MRI limits liver lesion characterization. The United States Food and Drug Administration's recent approval of an intravenous US contrast agent for pediatric liver lesion characterization (sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) and its excellent safety profile have spurred increased interest in contrast-enhanced US for definitive diagnosis of pediatric liver lesions. This review focuses on the safety of contrast-enhanced US, role of contrast-enhanced US in the evaluation of focal liver lesions, basic contrast-enhanced US technique for liver imaging, and interpretation principles. The authors review common focal liver lesions, with special attention to the role of contrast-enhanced US in the pediatric oncology population.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaChildHumansLiver DiseasesUltrasonographyContrast MediaChildrenContrast-enhanced ultrasoundLesionLiverOncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.