Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620809›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2020

Rescuing the attentional performance of rats with cholinergic losses by the M1 positive allosteric modulator TAK-071.

Aaron Kucinski, Kyra B Phillips, Ajeesh Koshy Cherian, Martin Sarter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Make a Left Turn: Cortico-Striatal Circuitry Mediating the Attentional Control of Complex Movements.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Complex Movement Control in a Rat Model of Parkinsonian Falls: Bidirectional Control by Striatal Cholinergic Interneurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron KucinskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Kyra B PhillipsDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Ajeesh Koshy CherianDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Martin SarterDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA. msarter@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0441-9936

Funding

NIDA Training Program in Neuroscience-Administrative SupplementT32DA007281 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Shelly Beth Flagel · 1995 to 2026
$5.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007281Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLoss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons contributes to the severity of the cognitive decline in age-related dementia and, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), to impairments in gait and balance and the resulting risks for falls. Contrasting with the extensive evidence indicating an essential role of cholinergic activity in mediating cognitive, specifically attentional abilities, treatment with conventional acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) has not fulfilled the promise of efficacy of pro-cholinergic treatments.

objectivesHere, we investigated the potential usefulness of a muscarinic M1 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) in an animal model of cholinergic loss-induced impairments in attentional performance. Given evidence indicating that fast, transient cholinergic signaling mediates the detection of cues in attentional contexts, we hypothesized that a M1 PAM amplifies such transient signaling and thereby rescues attentional performance.

resultsRats performed an operant sustained attention task (SAT), including in the presence of a distractor (dSAT) and during a post-distractor (post-dSAT) period. The post-dSAT period served to assess the capacity for recovering performance following a disruptive event. Basal forebrain infusions of the cholino-specific immunotoxin 192 IgG-saporin impaired SAT performance, and greater cholinergic losses predicted lower post-dSAT performance. Administration of TAK-071 (0.1, 0.3 mg/kg, p.o., administered over 6-day blocks) improved the performance of all rats during the post-dSAT period (main effect of dose). Drug-induced improvement of post-dSAT performance was relatively greater in lesioned rats, irrespective of sex, but also manifested in female control rats. TAK-071 primarily improved perceptual sensitivity (d') in lesioned rats and facilitated the adoption of a more liberal response bias (B˝

conclusionsThese findings suggest that TAK-071 may benefit the attentional performance of patients with partial cholinergic losses and specifically in situations that tax top-down, or goal-driven, attentional control.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionCholinergic AgentsCholinergic NeuronsCuesMaleRatsReceptors, MuscarinicTask Performance and AnalysisCholinergic AgentsReceptors, Muscarinic192 IgG-saporinAcetylcholineAttentionBasal forebrainCortexTAK-071

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.