Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620808›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

[

Francesco Pasqualetti, Marco Panichi, Martina Sollini, Aldo Sainato, Luca Galli, Riccardo Morganti, Serena Chiacchio, Andrea Marciano, Roberta Zanca, Lorenzo Mannelli and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Thorax radiotherapy usingFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco PasqualettiRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy. f.pasqualetti@ao-pisa.toscana.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0788-1205
Marco PanichiRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Martina SolliniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Aldo SainatoRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Luca GalliMedical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Riccardo MorgantiStatistic Analysis Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Serena ChiacchioNuclear Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea MarcianoNuclear Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Roberta ZancaNuclear Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Lorenzo MannelliIRCCS SDN Naples, Naples, Italy.
Gabriele CoraggioRadiation Oncology, Hopitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor APHP, Créteil, France.
Andrea SbranaMedical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Paola CocuzzaRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Sabrina MontroneRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Davide BaldacciniRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra GonnelliRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro MolinariRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Martina CantarellaRadiation Oncology, Casa di Cura SanRossore, Pisa, Italy.
Valentina MazzottiStatistic Analysis Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Sergio RicciMedical Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Fabiola PaiarRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Paola Anna ErbaNuclear Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Via Roma 67, 56123, Pisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRHumanitas University · ITSDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last years, functional imaging has given a significant contribution to the clinical decision-making of biochemically relapsed prostate cancer (PCa). Hereby, we present a prospective study aiming to validate the role of [

methodsPatients with biochemical recurrence limited up to three lesions revealed by [

resultsForty-six patients were evaluated, and a total of 67 lesions were treated. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, systemic therapy was started in 30 patients (65.2%) and median systemic therapy-free survival was 39.1 months (95% CI 6.5-68.6); 6, 12, and 24-month ratios were 93.5%, 73.9%, and 63.1%, respectively. At univariate Cox regression analysis, Delta PSA demonstrated an impact on systemic therapy-free survival (p < 0.001).

conclusionsBased on our findings, [

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryCholineHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenCholinefluorocholineProstate-Specific Antigen[18F]FMCH PET/CTProstate cancerStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31620808
PMCPMC6885020
OpenAlexW2981300549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.