Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620716›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2019

Imaging live bacteria at the nanoscale: comparison of immobilisation strategies.

Georgina Benn, Alice L B Pyne, Maxim G Ryadnov, Bart W Hoogenboom

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surface-dependent reorganization ofCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in oral health · 2022
    Article
  13. Challenges and approaches to studying pore-forming proteins.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  14. Phase separation in the outer membrane ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgina BennLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1H 0AH, UK. b.hoogenboom@ucl.ac.uk.
Alice L B Pyne
Maxim G Ryadnov
Bart W Hoogenboom
London Centre for Nanotechnology · GBNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R000328/1Medical Research Council MR/R024871/1Medical Research Council MR/R024871/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides an effective, label-free technique enabling the imaging of live bacteria under physiological conditions with nanometre precision. However, AFM is a surface scanning technique, and the accuracy of its performance requires the effective and reliable immobilisation of bacterial cells onto substrates. Here, we compare the effectiveness of various chemical approaches to facilitate the immobilisation of Escherichia coli onto glass cover slips in terms of bacterial adsorption, viability and compatibility with correlative imaging by fluorescence microscopy. We assess surface functionalisation using gelatin, poly-l-lysine, Cell-Tak™, and Vectabond®. We describe how bacterial immobilisation, viability and suitability for AFM experiments depend on bacterial strain, buffer conditions and surface functionalisation. We demonstrate the use of such immobilisation by AFM images that resolve the porin lattice on the bacterial surface; local degradation of the bacterial cell envelope by an antimicrobial peptide (Cecropin B); and the formation of membrane attack complexes on the bacterial membrane.

Indexed as

BuffersCell AdhesionCell MembraneCells, ImmobilizedEscherichia coliGelatinMicroscopy, Atomic ForcePolylysinePorinsPropylaminesSilanesamino-propyl-triethoxysilaneBuffersGelatinPolylysinePorinsPropylaminesSilanes

Identifiers

PMID31620716
PMCPMC7138128
OpenAlexW2979350020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.