ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2019
What is the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in the Detection of Bone Metastasis in Patients with Breast Cancer?
Article in European journal of breast health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of PET/computed tomography versus PET/MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in the N- and M-staging of breast cancer patients.Nuclear medicine communications · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of PET with Different Radiotracers versus Bone Scintigraphy for Detecting Bone Metastases of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Conventional Imaging, MRI andCancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom August 2018 to January 2019, a total of 23 patients with pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer underwent whole-body hybrid 18F-FDG -PET/MRI for initial staging and follow-up of their malignancies. The number of the bone metastasis was recorded for each patient. The total 18F-FDG-PET/MRI protocol was compared with PET only and the contrast enhanced fused (CE) component for the detection of bone metastasis.
resultsEight (26%) of 23 patients had bone metastasis. Bone metastases were dominantly localized in the spine (63%) and pelvis (25%). In terms of the total number of detected bone metastasis, there was a statistically significant difference between 18F-FDG-PET/MRI (mean 3.57; median 0; range, 0-2) and PET only component (mean 2.87; median 0; range, 0-1) (p=0.026), but no statistically significant difference was detected between 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and whole-body CE MRI (mean 3.43; median 0; range 0-2) (p=0.083).
conclusionWhole-body hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI is superior to PET component only, but no statistically significant difference between hybrid 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and whole-body CE MRI is found for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.