Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620309›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2019

Statistical Analysis of Survival Models Using Feature Quantification on Prostate Cancer Histopathological Images.

Jian Ren, Eric A Singer, Evita Sadimin, David J Foran, Xin Qi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jian RenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Eric A SingerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Evita SadiminDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
David J ForanCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Informatics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Xin QiCenter for Biomedical Imaging and Informatics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
Methods and Tools for Integrating Pathomics Data into Cancer RegistriesUH3CA225021 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CLIFFORD, GARI DAVID, DURBIN, ERIC B. · 2020 to 2022
$1.9M
Methods and Tools for Integrating Pathomics Data into Cancer RegistriesUG3CA225021 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DURBIN, ERIC B., FORAN, DAVID J · 2018 to 2019
$815k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA225021NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA225021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations.

methodsThree texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages.

resultsBased on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty.

conclusionsThis approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types.

Indexed as

Histopathological imageimage featuresneural networksprostate cancersurvival models

Identifiers

PMID31620309
PMCPMC6788183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.