Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620307›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2019

U D'Amora, A Ronca, M G Raucci, S M Dozio, H Lin, Y Fan, X Zhang, L Ambrosio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. RSC advances · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

U D'AmoraInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
A RoncaInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
M G RaucciInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
S M DozioInstitute of Science and Technology for Ceramics, National Research Council, Faenza, Italy.
H LinNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Y FanNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
X ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
L AmbrosioInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council, Naples, Italy.
National Research Council · ITSichuan University · CNInstitute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main driving idea of the present study was the comparison between two different chemical modifications of hyaluronic acid (HA) followed by the development of nanocomposite hydrogels directly

Indexed as

hyaluronic acid derivativesnanocompositesphotocrosslinkingsol-gel

Identifiers

PMID31620307
PMCPMC6783703
OpenAlexW2979552590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.