Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620305›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Usage of a German prevention and health promotion web portal and cost per pageview: A life-cycle assessment.

Stefan Kohler, Thomas Keil, Thomas Reinhold, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, Stefan N Willich, Stephanie Roll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Digital health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan KohlerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-7506
Thomas KeilInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Thomas ReinholdInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Falk Müller-RiemenschneiderInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Stefan N WillichInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Stephanie RollInstitute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeb portals providing health information online have the potential to reach large numbers of people. Yet few studies have assessed usage and costs of health portals, especially over an extended period of time.

objectivesFirst, to assess the usage of a web portal on prevention and health promotion that was initiated by the German states of Berlin and Brandenburg. Second, to estimate average cost per pageview over the full web portal life-cycle.

methodsUsage data were gathered through Google Analytics. The main usage metric assessed was pageviews originating from an IP address in Berlin or Brandenburg. Project cost data were reported by the local government and from own records. Descriptive and regression analyses were used to determine time trends in pageviews.

resultsThe redesigned web portal Praeventionsatlas.de launched August 2011 and was discontinued March 2018. Analyzing the full calendar years only, the annual pageview number increased from 2012 (8492) to its peak in 2014 (11,876) and steadily decreased to its minimum in 2017 (7232). Pages of the web portal were most often viewed around lunchtime (12 to 1 p.m.), in the middle of the week (Wed to Thu), and at the beginning of the year (Jan to Feb). Adjusting for year, month, and weekday, the number of daily pageviews dropped on major public holidays (Easter -9, Pentecost -12, Christmas -12 and New Year's Eve and Day -20;

conclusionUsage of the web portal showed temporal variation and peaked before the middle of its 6.5 year life-cycle. Development and need for updates may require substantial investment in a web portal, such that a pageview can come at a considerable expense, even in small-scale projects. Assessing and discussing the cost-effectiveness of a web portal is therefore desirable.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessCosting studyeHealthhealth information portalhealth promotioninformation seeking behaviorInternetnoncommunicable diseasespreventive health servicespublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID31620305
PMCPMC6775542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.