ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019
Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifactor Analysis of a Genome-Wide Selection System inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association study and genomic selection of brace root traits related to lodging resistance in maize.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Leveraging prior biological knowledge improves prediction of tocochromanols in maize grain.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Article
- Genetic control of morphological traits useful for improving sorghum.Breeding science · 2023Article
- Genetics and breeding for resistance against four leaf spot diseases in wheat (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
- Dissection of the practical soybean breeding pipeline by developing ZDX1, a high-throughput functional array.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022Article
- Genetic dissection of maize plant architecture using a novel nested association mapping population.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Prediction for Bacterial Wilt Resistance in Common Bean (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genomic prediction through machine learning and neural networks for traits with epistasis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Integrated model for genomic prediction under additive and non-additive genetic architecture.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Modeling first order additive × additive epistasis improves accuracy of genomic prediction for sclerotinia stem rot resistance in canola.The plant genome · 2021Article
- Advances in Cereal Crop Genomics for Resilience under Climate Change.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Identifying quantitative trait loci for the general combining ability of yield-relevant traits in maize.Breeding science · 2021Article
- A Genome-Wide Association Study Pinpoints Quantitative Trait Genes for Plant Height, Heading Date, Grain Quality, and Yield in Rye (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Genetic Dissection of Grain Yield of Maize and Yield-Related Traits Through Association Mapping and Genomic Prediction.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Adoption and Optimization of Genomic Selection To Sustain Breeding for Apricot Fruit Quality.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Genetic mapping and genomic selection for maize stalk strength.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS), a tool developed for molecular breeding, is used by plant breeders to improve breeding efficacy by shortening the breeding cycle and to facilitate the selection of candidate lines for creating hybrids without phenotyping in various environments. Association and linkage mapping have been widely used to explore and detect candidate genes in order to understand the genetic mechanisms of quantitative traits. In the current study, phenotypic and genotypic data from three experimental populations, including data on six agronomic traits (e.g., plant height, ear height, ear length, ear diameter, grain yield per plant, and hundred-kernel weight), were used to evaluate the effect of trait-relevant markers (TRMs) on prediction accuracy estimation. Integrating information from mapping into a statistical model can efficiently improve prediction performance compared with using stochastically selected markers to perform GS. The prediction accuracy can reach plateau when a total of 500-1,000 TRMs are utilized in GS. The prediction accuracy can be significantly enhanced by including nonadditive effects and TRMs in the GS model when genotypic data with high proportions of heterozygous alleles and complex agronomic traits with high proportion of nonadditive variancein phenotypic variance are used to perform GS. In addition, taking information on population structure into account can slightly improve prediction performance when the genetic relationship between the training and testing sets is influenced by population stratification due to different allele frequencies. In conclusion, GS is a useful approach for prescreening candidate lines, and the empirical evidence provided by the current study for TRMs and nonadditive effects can inform plant breeding and in turn contribute to the improvement of selection efficiency in practical GS-assisted breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.