Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31620155›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Improving Genomic Selection With Quantitative Trait Loci and Nonadditive Effects Revealed by Empirical Evidence in Maize.

Xiaogang Liu, Hongwu Wang, Xiaojiao Hu, Kun Li, Zhifang Liu, Yujin Wu, Changling Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Dissection of the practical soybean breeding pipeline by developing ZDX1, a high-throughput functional array.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaogang LiuInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongwu WangInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaojiao HuInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kun LiInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhifang LiuInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yujin WuInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changling HuangInstitute of Crop Science, National Key Facility of Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS), a tool developed for molecular breeding, is used by plant breeders to improve breeding efficacy by shortening the breeding cycle and to facilitate the selection of candidate lines for creating hybrids without phenotyping in various environments. Association and linkage mapping have been widely used to explore and detect candidate genes in order to understand the genetic mechanisms of quantitative traits. In the current study, phenotypic and genotypic data from three experimental populations, including data on six agronomic traits (e.g., plant height, ear height, ear length, ear diameter, grain yield per plant, and hundred-kernel weight), were used to evaluate the effect of trait-relevant markers (TRMs) on prediction accuracy estimation. Integrating information from mapping into a statistical model can efficiently improve prediction performance compared with using stochastically selected markers to perform GS. The prediction accuracy can reach plateau when a total of 500-1,000 TRMs are utilized in GS. The prediction accuracy can be significantly enhanced by including nonadditive effects and TRMs in the GS model when genotypic data with high proportions of heterozygous alleles and complex agronomic traits with high proportion of nonadditive variancein phenotypic variance are used to perform GS. In addition, taking information on population structure into account can slightly improve prediction performance when the genetic relationship between the training and testing sets is influenced by population stratification due to different allele frequencies. In conclusion, GS is a useful approach for prescreening candidate lines, and the empirical evidence provided by the current study for TRMs and nonadditive effects can inform plant breeding and in turn contribute to the improvement of selection efficiency in practical GS-assisted breeding programs.

Indexed as

association and linkage mappinggenomic selectionmaizenonadditive effectpopulation structuretrait-relevant marker

Identifiers

PMID31620155
PMCPMC6759780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.