ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2019
Best Practices Related to Examination Item Construction and Post-hoc Review.
Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Cost-Effective 3D-Printed Airway Suction Simulator for Respiratory Therapy Students.Respiratory care · 2024Trial
- Evaluation of 6-Month Knowledge Retention and Satisfaction After Pedagogical Escape Games in Dentistry.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- Improving MCQ quality using a self-evaluation checklist: A quasi-experimental study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- ItemSight: Development of a Shiny Application for Simplified Item Analysis of Type A Multiple-Choice Questions.Cureus · 2026Article
- Development of an assessment tool for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia image interpretation.Anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Review
- A Practical Guide to Grade Adjustment or Curving for Pharmacy and Other Professional Health Programs.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Multiple-Choice Question Formats in a First Year Medical Physiology Course.Journal of CME · 2024Article
- Teaching LGBTQ+ Health, a Web-Based Faculty Development Course: Program Evaluation Study Using the RE-AIM Framework.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- Information overdose: Student performance and perceptions of pharmacology resources on exams.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2023Article
- Differences in Multiple-Choice Questions of Opposite Stem Orientations Based on a Novel Item Quality Measure.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2023Article
- The effect of access to electronic resources during examination on medical and dental students scores in summative assessment: quasi experimental study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Getting Rigor Right.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- A comparison of free-response and multiple-choice questions on the American Board of Pathology primary certification examinations.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.