Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619529›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Impact of Fragmentation on Commutability of Epstein-Barr Virus and Cytomegalovirus Quantitative Standards.

R T Hayden, L Tang, Y Su, L Cook, Z Gu, K R Jerome, J Boonyaratanakornkit, S Sam, S Pounds, A M Caliendo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital PCR to Measure SARS-CoV-2 RNA, Variants, and Outcomes in Youth.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R T HaydenDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA Randall.Hayden@stjude.org.
L TangDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Y SuDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
L CookDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-6598
Z GuDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
K R JeromeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J BoonyaratanakornkitExact Diagnostics, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
S SamMiriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
S PoundsDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
A M CaliendoDepartment of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI LARRY K BROWN · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the adaptation of international standards, quantitative viral load testing of transplant-associated viruses continues to be limited by interlaboratory disagreement. Studies have suggested that this disagreement and the poor commutability of standards may, in some cases, be linked to amplicon size and the fragmentation of circulating viral DNA. We evaluated target fragmentation as a cause of noncommutability and pretest fragmentation of quantitative standards as a potential means of increasing commutability and interassay agreement. Forty-two cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive and 41 Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive plasma samples, together with two different quantitative standards for each virus, were tested as unknowns using 10 different quantitative PCR assays at 5 different laboratories. Standards were tested both intact and after intentional fragmentation by ultrasonication. Quantitative agreement between methods was assessed, together with commutability, using multiple statistical approaches. Most assays yielded results within 0.5 log

Indexed as

CytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDNA, ViralEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityViral LoadDNA, Viralcalibratorcommutabilityfragmentationquantitative PCRstandardstandardizationWHO

Identifiers

PMID31619529
PMCPMC6935903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.