Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619513›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2019

Evaluation and comparison of pain questionnaires for clinical screening of osteoarthritis in cats.

Sarah Stadig, B Duncan X Lascelles, Gorel Nyman, Anna Bergh

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah StadigDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-2450
B Duncan X LascellesDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-9009
Gorel NymanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna BerghDepartment of Clinical Sciences, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden anna.bergh@slu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5567-6249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeline osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of long-standing pain and physical dysfunction. Performing a physical examination of a cat is often challenging. There is a need for disease-specific questionnaires or the so-called clinical metrology instruments (CMIs) to facilitate diagnosis and evaluation of treatment of feline OA. The CMI provides the owners an assessment of the cat's behavioural and lifestyle changes in the home environment. The purpose of the study was to evaluate readability, internal consistency, reliability and discriminatory ability of four CMIs.

methodsThis is a prospective, cross-sectional study with 142 client-owned cats. Feline OA was diagnosed based on medical history, orthopaedic examination and radiography.

resultsThe results indicate that all four instruments have sound readability, internal consistency, are reliable over time and have good discriminatory ability. Preliminary cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity were suggested for each instrument. The osteoarthritic cats showed significant changes in behavioural response to pain during orthopaedic examination, compared with sound cats.

conclusionThe results indicate that all four questionnaires make an important contribution in a clinical setting, and that the cat's behavioural response to pain during physical examination should be a parameter to take into account as a possible indication of chronic pain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCat DiseasesCatsCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleOsteoarthritisOwnershipPainProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesCreatininechronic painclinical metrology instrumentsfelineowner assessmentpressure mat techniquesensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31619513
PMCPMC6996100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.