Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619489›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

The Synaptic Vesicle Cycle Revisited: New Insights into the Modes and Mechanisms.

Natali L Chanaday, Michael A Cousin, Ira Milosevic, Shigeki Watanabe, Jennifer R Morgan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
145citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

145 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Presynaptic Vesicles Supply Membrane for Axonal Bouton Enlargement during Long Term Potentiation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Janus Synapses as Modular Neurointerfaces.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Natali L ChanadayDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232.ORCID 0000-0002-3376-5187
Michael A CousinCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9XD.ORCID 0000-0002-1762-160X
Ira MilosevicEuropean Neuroscience Institute Göttingen, a Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Göttingen and the Max Planck Society, Göttingen, Germany 37077.ORCID 0000-0001-6440-3763
Shigeki WatanabeDepartment of Cell Biology and Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and.ORCID 0000-0001-7580-8141
Jennifer R MorganEugene Bell Center for Regenerative Biology and Tissue Engineering, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 jmorgan@mbl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9915-6360
Johns Hopkins University · USMarine Biological Laboratory · USMax Planck Society · DEMRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Role of SNARE Interactions in Central Synapse FunctionR01MH066198 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI KAVALALI, EGE T · 2004 to 2023
$7.9M
Mechanisms of Synaptic Dysfunction in Parkinson s and Other Synuclein-Linked DiseasesR01NS078165 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Jennifer Rebecca Morgan · 2012 to 2026
$5.5M
Reviving electron microscopy for synaptic cell biologyDP2NS111133 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WATANABE, SHIGEKI · 2018 to 2018
$2.5M
Spatial and molecular determinants of fusion probability and timingR01NS105810 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WATANABE, SHIGEKI · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066198NINDS NIH HHS DP2 NS111133NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS078165NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105810Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 204954/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotransmission is sustained by endocytosis and refilling of synaptic vesicles (SVs) locally within the presynapse. Until recently, a consensus formed that after exocytosis, SVs are recovered by either fusion pore closure (kiss-and-run) or clathrin-mediated endocytosis directly from the plasma membrane. However, recent data have revealed that SV formation is more complex than previously envisaged. For example, two additional recycling pathways have been discovered, ultrafast endocytosis and activity-dependent bulk endocytosis, in which SVs are regenerated from the internalized membrane and synaptic endosomes. Furthermore, these diverse modes of endocytosis appear to influence both the molecular composition and subsequent physiological role of individual SVs. In addition, previously unknown complexity in SV refilling and reclustering has been revealed. This review presents a modern view of the SV life cycle and discusses how neuronal subtype, physiological temperature, and individual activity patterns can recruit different endocytic modes to generate new SVs and sculpt subsequent presynaptic performance.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneEndocytosisEndosomesHumansNeuronsSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionSynaptic Vesicles

Identifiers

PMID31619489
PMCPMC6794917
OpenAlexW2980728936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.