Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619418›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Rehabilitation and reintegration programming adjunct to female genital fistula surgery: a scoping review protocol.

Alison M El Ayadi, Caitlyn E Painter, Alexandre Delamou, Jill Barr-Walker, Susan Obore, Josaphat Byamugisha, Abner Korn, Justus K Barageine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rehabilitation and reintegration programming adjunct to female genital fistula surgery: A systematic scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alison M El AyadiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA alison.elayadi@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2674-4887
Caitlyn E PainterDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Alexandre DelamouDepartment of Public Health, Gamal Abdel Nasser University, Conakry, Guinea.
Jill Barr-WalkerZSFG Library, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susan OboreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Josaphat ByamugishaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Abner KornDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Justus K BarageineDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
University of California, San Francisco · USMulago Hospital · UGGamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry · GN

Funding

Comprehensive Reintegration Assistance for Women with Obstetric FistulaR00HD086232 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EL AYADI, ALISON M · 2018 to 2020
$713k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD086232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFemale genital fistula is a debilitating traumatic injury, largely birth-associated, globally affecting up to 2 million women, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa. Fistula has significant physical, psychological and economic consequences. Women often face challenges in reintegrating and resuming prior roles despite successful surgery. Synthesising the evidence on services adjunct to fistula surgery and their outcomes is important for developing the evidence base for best practices and identifying research priorities. This scoping review seeks to examine the range of rehabilitation and reintegration services provided as adjunct to genital fistula surgery, map the existing programming and outcomes, and identify areas for additional research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our scoping review is informed by existing methodological frameworks and will be conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-ScR guidelines. The search strategy will be applied to nine biomedical, public health and social science databases. The initial search was completed on 27 September 2018. Grey literature will be identified through targeted Google searches and from organisational websites identified as relevant by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Campaign to End Fistula. We will iteratively build our search strategy through term harvesting and review, and search reference lists of reports and articles to identify additional studies. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, followed by full-text screening of all potentially relevant articles and standardised data extraction. Articles eligible for inclusion will discuss research or programmatic efforts around service provision in adjunct to surgery among females with genital fistula. Data will be presented in summary tables accompanied by narrative description. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for a scoping review. Our results can be used to inform policy, serve as support for funding and development of reintegration programmes and highlight areas for subsequent research. Results will be disseminated at relevant conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansInfertility, FemaleObstetric Labor ComplicationsPainPregnancyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSocial StigmaUrinary IncontinenceVaginal Fistulafemale genital fistularehabilitationreintegrationscoping reviewsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID31619418
PMCPMC6797431
OpenAlexW2981266132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.