Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619396›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2019

Early Events in Coccidioidomycosis.

Fariba M Donovan, Lisa Shubitz, Daniel Powell, Marc Orbach, Jeffrey Frelinger, John N Galgiani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Drug Discovery and Repurposing forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Early immune response toMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Coccidioidomycosis: a growing global concern.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Emergence ofIDCases · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Host Response to Coccidioidomycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Coccidioidomycosis: A Contemporary Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fariba M DonovanValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA faribadonovan@deptofmed.arizona.edu.
Lisa ShubitzValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Daniel PowellValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Marc OrbachValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Jeffrey FrelingerValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
John N GalgianiValley Fever Center for Excellence, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its description nearly 130 years ago, hundreds of studies have deepened our understanding of coccidioidomycosis, also known as valley fever (VF), and provided useful diagnostic tests and treatments for the disease caused by the dimorphic fungi

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsCoccidioidesCoccidioidomycosisDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityHumansImmunityLife Cycle StagesCoccidioides researchcoccidioidomycosisearly coccidioidomycosisearly events in valley fever

Identifiers

PMID31619396
PMCPMC6927309
OpenAlexW2980814889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.