Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619234›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Quality and barriers of outpatient diabetes care in rural health facilities in Uganda - a mixed methods study.

Catherine Birabwa, Mulekya F Bwambale, Peter Waiswa, Roy W Mayega

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Access and Use of Health Services by People with Diabetes from the Item Response Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catherine BirabwaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University Kampala - College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. cathybirabwa3@gmail.com.
Mulekya F BwambaleDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University Kampala - College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University Kampala - College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Roy W MayegaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University Kampala - College of Health Sciences School of Public Health, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing burden of diabetes in Uganda, little is known about the quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) care especially in rural areas. Poor quality of care is a serious limitation to the control of diabetes and its complications. This study assessed the quality of care and barriers to service delivery in two rural districts in Eastern Uganda.

methodsThis was a mixed methods cross-sectional study, conducted in six facilities. A randomly selected sample of 377 people with diabetes was interviewed using a pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire. Key informant interviews were also conducted with diabetes care providers. Data was collected on health outcomes, processes of care and foundations for high quality health systems. The study included three health outcomes, six elements of competent care under processes and 16 elements of tools/resources and workforce under foundations. Descriptive statistics were computed to determine performance under each domain, and thematic content analysis was used for qualitative data.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 49 years (±11.7 years) with a median duration of diabetes of 4 years (inter-quartile range = 2.7 years). The overall facility readiness score was 73.9%. Inadequacies were found in health worker training in standard diabetes care, availability of medicines, and management systems for services. These were also the key barriers to provision and access to care in addition to lack of affordability. Screening of clients for blood cholesterol and microvascular complications was very low. Regarding outcomes; 56.8% of participants had controlled blood glucose, 49.3% had controlled blood pressure; and 84.0% reported having at least one complication.

conclusionThe quality of T2DM care provided in these rural facilities is sub-optimal, especially the process of care. The consequences include sub-optimal blood glucose and blood pressure control. Improving availability of essential medicines and basic technologies and competence of health workers can improve the care process leading to better outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisDelivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drugs, EssentialFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHealth ResourcesHealth WorkforceHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleDrugs, EssentialHypoglycemic AgentsBarriersHealth facilitiesQuality of careRural UgandaType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31619234
PMCPMC6796349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.