Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619196›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Effectiveness of a brief psychological mindfulness-based intervention for the treatment of depression in primary care: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Alba Lopez-Montoyo, Soledad Quero, Jesus Montero-Marin, Alberto Barcelo-Soler, Maria Beltran, Daniel Campos, Javier Garcia-Campayo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03034343 (Effectiveness of a Brief Psychological Mindfulness Based Intervention for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03034343 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of a Brief Psychological Mindfulness Based Intervention for the Treatment of Depression in Primary Care: Face-to-face Application, Treatment as Usual and Application Through ICTs

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2016 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsDepressive DisorderArmsMindfulness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding Historical Trauma Among Urban Indigenous Adults at Risk for Diabetes.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alba Lopez-MontoyoUniversitat Jaume I, Av. Vicente Sos Baynat s/n, 12006, Castellón, Spain.
Soledad QueroUniversitat Jaume I, Av. Vicente Sos Baynat s/n, 12006, Castellón, Spain. squero@uji.es.
Jesus Montero-MarinPrimary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (RedIAPP), Zaragoza, Spain.
Alberto Barcelo-SolerUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Maria BeltranUniversity of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Daniel CamposUniversitat Jaume I, Av. Vicente Sos Baynat s/n, 12006, Castellón, Spain.
Javier Garcia-CampayoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepressive symptoms are quite prevalent in Primary Care (PC) settings. The treatment as usual (TAU) in PC is pharmacotherapy, despite the high relapse rates it produces. Many patients would prefer psychotherapy, but specialized services are overloaded. Studies that apply Mindfulness-Based Interventions (MBIs) for the treatment of depression have obtained significant improvements. Brief low-intensity approaches delivered from PC could be a promising approach. This study aims to compare a low-intensity mindfulness intervention for the treatment of depression in PC using different intervention formats - a face-to-face MBI delivered in a group and the same MBI individually applied on the Internet - to a control group that will receive PC medical treatment as usual.

methodsA randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted in PC, with about 120 depressed patients allocated (1:1:1) to three groups: "face-to-face MBI + TAU", "Internet-delivered MBI + TAU", and "TAU alone". The MBI programs will be composed of four modules. The primary outcome will be depressive symptoms, measured through the Beck Depression Inventory, assessed at pre- and post-treatment and 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Other outcomes will be mindfulness, happiness, affectivity, quality of life, and the use of healthcare services. Intention-to-treat analysis using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores and routine sociodemographic analysis that could show baseline differences will be conducted. Per-protocol secondary outcome analyses will also be performed. DISCUSSION: This is the first Spanish RCT to apply a low-intensity face-to-face MBI (plus TAU) to treat depression in PC settings compared to TAU (alone). Moreover, this study will also make it possible to evaluate the same MBI program (plus TAU), but Internet-delivered, considering their cost-effectiveness. Positive results from this RCT might have an important impact on mental health settings, helping to decrease the overload of the system and offering treatment alternatives beyond antidepressant medication through high-quality, flexible PC interventions.

trial registrationClinical Trials.gov NCT03034343 . Trial Registration date 24 January 2017, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMindfulnessPrimary Health CarePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotherapy, BriefQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeDepressionFace-to-faceInternet deliveredLow-intensityMindfulness-based interventionprimary careRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31619196
PMCPMC6796394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.