Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31619186›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

The change in haemoglobin concentration between the first and third trimesters of pregnancy: a population study.

David Churchill, Manisha Nair, Simon J Stanworth, Marian Knight

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Investigating the Dual Role of Trace and Toxic Elements in Pregnancy-Related Health Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal Hemoglobin Concentration and Long-Term Child Neurocognitive Development.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David ChurchillThe Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK. david.churchill1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-2953
Manisha NairNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Simon J StanworthDepartment of Haematology, NHS Blood and Transplant/Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
University of Oxford · GBNew Cross Hospital · GBNHS Blood and Transplant · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physiological fall in haemoglobin concentration from the 1st to the 3rd trimester of pregnancy is often quoted as 5 g/L. However, other studies have suggested varying levels of fall between 8 and 13 g/L. We evaluated the change in haemoglobin concentration between the 1st and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy in a multi-ethnic population of pregnant women.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis of 7054 women with singleton pregnancies, giving birth during 2013-15 in a single urban maternity unit in England. We calculated the changes in haemoglobin concentration from 1st to 3rd trimester using the first trimester haemoglobin as the reference point. The population was stratified into sub-groups to explore any differences that existed within the population.

resultsIn general the fall in haemoglobin concentration was in the order of 14 g/L or 11% of the first trimester value. This fall was consistent for the majority of sub-groups of the population. The fall was lower (7.7%) in the most deprived section of the population, IMD1, but it increased to 11.7% when we restricted that sub-group to pregnant women without health problems during the index pregnancy. Conversely, there was an increase in haemoglobin of 10.2% in women whose first trimester haemoglobin concentration was in the lowest 5% of the total study population. The population fall in haemoglobin was 10.2 g/L (7.8%), after excluding cases above the 95th and below the 5th centiles, and women with a medical and/or obstetric disorder during the pregnancy.

conclusionThe fall in haemoglobin during pregnancy is in the order of 14 g/L or 11% of the first trimester level. This is 2 to 3 times higher than suggested by some guidelines and higher than previously published work. The results challenge the current accepted thresholds for practice, and have broader implications for diagnosis and managment of antenatal anaemia. Fall in haemoglobin across pregnancy is around 14 g/L (11%) and significantly higher than previously stated in the pregnant population. This poses questions over currently accepted thresholds for anaemia in pregnancy.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAnemiaBiomarkersEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemoglobinsHumansIncidencePregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, ThirdRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsBiomarkersHemoglobinsAnaemiaConcentrationHaemoglobinPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID31619186
PMCPMC6796328
OpenAlexW2980955132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.