SynthesisEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2020
Progression of conventional cardiovascular risk factors and vascular disease risk in individuals: insights from the PROG-IMT consortium.
Synthesis in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Neurovascular disease in Switzerland: 10-year trends show non-traditional risk factors on the rise and higher exposure in women.European journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Off-Target Effects of Antidepressants on Vascular Function and Structure.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular risk and testosterone - from subclinical atherosclerosis to lipoprotein function to heart failure.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021Review
- Mild Head Trauma: Is Antiplatelet Therapy a Risk Factor for Hemorrhagic Complications?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Effect of a 6-Month Controlled Lifestyle Intervention on Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
56 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAveraged measurements, but not the progression based on multiple assessments of carotid intima-media thickness, (cIMT) are predictive of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in individuals. Whether this is true for conventional risk factors is unclear. METHODS AND
resultsAn individual participant meta-analysis was used to associate the annualised progression of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with future cardiovascular disease risk in 13 prospective cohort studies of the PROG-IMT collaboration (
conclusionAveraged measurements of systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol displayed significant linear relationships with the risk of future cardiovascular disease events. However, there was no clear association between the annualised progression of these conventional risk factors in individuals with the risk of future clinical endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.