ReviewCancers2019
Technological and Therapeutic Advances in Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal trends in the burden of tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer in China and globally: A comprehensive analysis from 1990 to 2021.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Pediatric Cancer Drug Development: Leveraging Insights in Cancer Biology and the Evolving Regulatory Landscape to Address Challenges and Guide Further Progress.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024Review
- The two sides of chromosomal instability: drivers and brakes in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Plus Etoposide with Cisplatin/Carboplatin in the First-Line Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Study.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Advanced age is not the decisive factor in chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: a population-based study.Aging · 2022Article
- Harnessing DLL3 inhibition: From old promises to new therapeutic horizons.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Human leukocyte antigen class II-based immune risk model for recurrence evaluation in stage I-III small cell lung cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021Article
- Molecular profiles of small cell lung cancer subtypes: therapeutic implications.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2021Review
- Article
- Design, Synthesis, and In Vitro/In Vivo Anti-Cancer Activities of Novel (20International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Magnitude, temporal trends and inequality in global burden of tracheal, bronchus and lung cancer: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.BMJ global health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers. The prognosis is poor with median survival in the advanced stage remaining at around 12 months. Despite applying every known therapeutic approach, no major breakthrough has improved the overall survival in the last 30 years. Historically, experiments performed on conventional cell lines may have limitations of not accurately reflecting the complex biological and genomic heterogeneity of this disease. However, additional knowledge gained from recently developed genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and patient derived xenografts (PDXs) have made encouraging inroads. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) data reveals a high mutational burden and a number of genetic alterations but low frequency of targetable mutations. Despite several failures, considerable therapeutic opportunities have recently emerged. Potentially promising therapies include those targeting DNA damage repair, stem cell/renewal and drug resistant mechanisms. Modest success has also been achieved with immune checkpoint inhibitors while therapeutic exploration of various other components of the immune system is underway. However, the complex heterogeneities reflect the need for accurate bio-markers to translate novel discoveries into clinical benefit. Additionally, the molecular mechanisms that differentiate chemo-sensitive from chemo-refractory disease remain unknown. Obtaining reliable tumour samples by utilising novel techniques such as endobronchial ultrasound guided needle aspiration or adopting to liquid biopsies are becoming popular. This review will focus on recent technological and therapeutic advancements to surmount this recalcitrant disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.