Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618950›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019

Psychopathological Symptoms and Gaming Motives in Disordered Gaming-A Psychometric Comparison between the WHO and APA Diagnostic Frameworks.

Christian Montag, Bruno Schivinski, Rayna Sariyska, Christopher Kannen, Zsolt Demetrovics, Halley M Pontes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The gaming disorder test and gaming disorder scale for adolescents: translation and validation among Vietnamese young adults.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian MontagDepartment of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany. christian.montag@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8112-0837
Bruno SchivinskiSchool of Media and Communication, RMIT University, VIC 3000 Melbourne, Australia. bruno.schivinski@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4095-1922
Rayna SariyskaDepartment of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany. rayna.sariyska@uni-ulm.de.
Christopher KannenIndependent Researcher: 50226 Frechen, Germany. info@ckannen.com.
Zsolt DemetrovicsInstitute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1064 Budapest, Hungary. demetrovics.zsolt@ppk.elte.hu.ORCID 0000-0001-5604-7551
Halley M PontesThe International Cyberpsychology and Addictions Research Laboratory (iCARL), University of Tasmania, TAS 7005 Launceston, Australia. contactme@halleypontes.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-7623
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Tasmania · AUEötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

German Research Foundation DFG, MO2363/3-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background'Gaming Disorder' (GD) has received increased medical attention and official recognition from both the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and the World Health Organization (WHO). Although these two medical organizations have independently developed promising clinical diagnostic frameworks to assess disordered gaming, little is known about how these frameworks compare at different psychometric levels in terms of producing consistent outcomes in the assessment of GD.

methodsA sample of 1429 German gamers (Mean

resultsThe findings suggest the existence of minor discrepancies in the estimation of prevalence rates of GD according among the two frameworks. Nevertheless, both diagnostic frameworks are fairly consistent in the psychometric prediction of GD in relation to gaming motives and psychopathological symptoms. The findings underscore the role of key gaming motives as risk factors and protective factors across both diagnostic frameworks. Finally, the study provides support for the WHO diagnostic framework for GD and its measurement with the German Gaming Disorder Test (GDT). The findings and their implications are further discussed in terms of clinical relevance.

Indexed as

American psychiatric associationgaming disorderinternet gaming disorderworld health organization

Identifiers

PMID31618950
PMCPMC6832511
OpenAlexW2980976903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.