ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
3D Printing of Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in 3D Printed Bone Implants: Smart Responsive Antibacterial Strategies and AI-Driven Design.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Effect of Gamma Irradiation and Simulated Physiological Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of a 3D-Printed βTCP Composite.Polymers · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Toxicological Evaluation of 3D-Printed Hydroxyapatite (3DPHA) for Bone Grafting Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Bone regenerative efficacy of binder-jet fabricated hydroxyapatite granules with and without biomimetic octacalcium phosphate-coated modification in a rat critical-sized calvarial defect model.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Advanced engineering strategies for biomaterial scaffolds application in tendon-bone interface regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- The Impact of Post-Printing Hydration in NaCl Solution on the Properties of Binder Jet 3D-Printed Calcium Sulfate and Its Converted Hydroxyapatite.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Novel Modifications in Endodontic Bioceramics to Improve their Properties: A Narrative Review.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2025Review
- Three Dimensionally Printed Octacalcium Phosphate via Binder Jetting for Use in Bone Grafting Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Transforming spinal surgery with innovations in biologics and additive manufacturing.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/ordered mesoporous calcium magnesium silicate nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Beyond hype: unveiling the Real challenges in clinical translation of 3D printed bone scaffolds and the fresh prospects of bioprinted organoids.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Fatigue Performance of 3D-Printed Poly-Lactic-Acid Bone Scaffolds with Triply Periodic Minimal Surface and Voronoi Pore Structures.Polymers · 2024Article
- Fabrication Strategies for Bioceramic Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering with Generative Design Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- From Nature to Technology: Exploring the Potential of Plant-Based Materials and Modified Plants in Biomimetics, Bionics, and Green Innovations.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 3D Printed SiOJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- 3D bioprinting technology to construct bone reconstruction research model and its feasibility evaluation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds: design strategies, present applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bioceramics have frequent use in functional restoration of hard tissues to improve human well-being. Additive manufacturing (AM) also known as 3D printing is an innovative material processing technique extensively applied to produce bioceramic parts or scaffolds in a layered perspicacious manner. Moreover, the applications of additive manufacturing in bioceramics have the capability to reliably fabricate the commercialized scaffolds tailored for practical clinical applications, and the potential to survive in the new era of effective hard tissue fabrication. The similarity of the materials with human bone histomorphometry makes them conducive to use in hard tissue engineering scheme. The key objective of this manuscript is to explore the applications of bioceramics-based AM in bone tissue engineering. Furthermore, the article comprehensively and categorically summarizes some novel bioceramics based AM techniques for the restoration of bones. At prior stages of this article, different ceramics processing AM techniques have been categorized, subsequently, processing of frequently used materials for bone implants and complexities associated with these materials have been elaborated. At the end, some novel applications of bioceramics in orthopedic implants and some future directions are also highlighted to explore it further. This review article will help the new researchers to understand the basic mechanism and current challenges in neophyte techniques and the applications of bioceramics in the orthopedic prosthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.