ArticleObesity facts2019
Weigh More, Pay More? Public Opinion on Varying Health Insurance Contributions among Divergent Weight Groups.
Article in Obesity facts, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of obesity and its related costs has increased over the past decades. In Germany, obesity-related costs are merely covered by statuary health insurance. Within the statutory health care system, the health insurance contributions do not differ between people with and without health issues, such as being obese. This study aims to investigate the public's opinion about whether people with obesity should pay a higher proportional health care contribution than people of normal weight.
methodsWe conducted a pilot study and collected thereof data of a convenience sample. In total, 179 participants who perceived themselves to be of normal weight (51.40% female; mean age = 32.46, SD = 5.74) were surveyed using a questionnaire. Within this questionnaire, the participants had to rate how high the proportional health care contribution for people with and without obesity should be. Moreover, we assessed participants' antifat attitudes by applying the Fat Phobia Scale and the Implicit Association Test.
resultsA paired t test revealed that participants suggest a significantly higher proportional contribution for health insurance for people with obesity compared to people with normal weight (t(178) = 4.51, p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicates that people with stronger explicit (OR = 8.77, p < 0.001) and implicit stigma (OR = 1.06, p = 0.018), and higher BMI (OR = 1.27, p = 0.04) are more likely to suggest an increased contribution rate for people with obesity.
conclusionAlthough we found that participants suggested higher contribution rates for people with obesity, overall only one-quarter of the participants suggested higher contribution rates for people with obesity, whereas almost three-quarters of the participants did not distinguish the contribution rate for people with and without obesity. Moreover, we found that the participants called for higher insurance premiums for people with and without obesity. Therefore, future studies should consider giving more information about the statutory health care system or the health care contribution rate before asking participants about their opinion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.