Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618721›Full record

ArticlePhysical biology2019

Constraining the complexity of promoter dynamics using fluctuations in gene expression.

Niraj Kumar, Rahul V Kulkarni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niraj KumarDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9200-576X
Rahul V KulkarniDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA 02125, United States of America.

Funding

UMass Boston-DF/HCC U54 Partnership (2 of 2)U54CA156734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON · PI ADAN COLON-CARMONA, Jill A. Macoska · 2010 to 2026
$24.9M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene expression is an inherently stochastic process with transcription of mRNAs often occurring in bursts: short periods of activity followed by typically longer periods of inactivity. While a simple model involving switching between two promoter states has been widely used to analyze transcription dynamics, recent experimental observations have provided evidence for more complex kinetic schemes underlying bursting. Specifically, experiments provide evidence for complexity in promoter dynamics during the switch from the transcriptionally inactive to the transcriptionally active state. An open question in the field is: what is the minimal complexity needed to model promoter dynamics and how can we determine this? Here, we show that measurements of mRNA fluctuations can be used to set fundamental bounds on the complexity of promoter dynamics. We study models wherein the switching time distribution from transcriptionally inactive to active states is described by a general waiting-time distribution. Using approaches from renewal theory and queueing theory, we derive analytical expressions which connect the Fano factor of mRNA distributions to the waiting-time distribution for promoter switching between inactive and active states. The results derived lead to bounds on the minimal number of promoter states and thus allow us to derive bounds on the minimal complexity of promoter dynamics based on single-cell measurements of mRNA levels.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, MessengerSingle-Cell AnalysisRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31618721
PMCPMC8011943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.