ArticlePhysical biology2019
Constraining the complexity of promoter dynamics using fluctuations in gene expression.
Article in Physical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solving stochastic gene-expression models using queueing theory: A tutorial review.Biophysical journal · 2024Review
- Quantifying Information of Dynamical Biochemical Reaction Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Stochastic Model of Gene Expression with Polymerase Recruitment and Pause Release.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression is an inherently stochastic process with transcription of mRNAs often occurring in bursts: short periods of activity followed by typically longer periods of inactivity. While a simple model involving switching between two promoter states has been widely used to analyze transcription dynamics, recent experimental observations have provided evidence for more complex kinetic schemes underlying bursting. Specifically, experiments provide evidence for complexity in promoter dynamics during the switch from the transcriptionally inactive to the transcriptionally active state. An open question in the field is: what is the minimal complexity needed to model promoter dynamics and how can we determine this? Here, we show that measurements of mRNA fluctuations can be used to set fundamental bounds on the complexity of promoter dynamics. We study models wherein the switching time distribution from transcriptionally inactive to active states is described by a general waiting-time distribution. Using approaches from renewal theory and queueing theory, we derive analytical expressions which connect the Fano factor of mRNA distributions to the waiting-time distribution for promoter switching between inactive and active states. The results derived lead to bounds on the minimal number of promoter states and thus allow us to derive bounds on the minimal complexity of promoter dynamics based on single-cell measurements of mRNA levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.