Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618416›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of clinical pathology2020

Systematic Review of the Use of Telepathology During Intraoperative Consultation.

Robin L Dietz, Douglas J Hartman, Liron Pantanowitz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of clinical pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Critical Value of Telepathology in the COVID-19 Era.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review of Systematic Reviews in the Field of Telemedicine.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Commentary: The Digital Fate of Glomeruli in Renal Biopsy.Journal of pathology informatics · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robin L DietzDepartment of Pathology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Douglas J HartmanDepartment of Pathology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
Liron PantanowitzDepartment of Pathology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA.
UPMC Health System · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare studies that used telepathology systems vs conventional microscopy for intraoperative consultation (frozen-section) diagnosis.

methodsA total of 56 telepathology studies with 13,996 cases in aggregate were identified through database searches.

resultsThe concordance of telepathology with the reference standard was generally excellent, with a weighted mean of 96.9%. In comparison, we identified seven studies using conventional intraoperative consultation that showed a weighted mean concordance of 98.3%. Evaluation of the risk of bias showed that most of these studies were low risk.

conclusionsDespite limitations such as variation in reporting and publication bias, this systematic review provides strong support for the safety of using telepathology for intraoperative consultations.

Indexed as

Remote ConsultationTelepathologyFrozen SectionsHumansIntraoperative PeriodQuality Assurance, Health CareFrozen sectionIntraoperative consultationSystematic reviewTelepathology

Identifiers

PMID31618416
PMCPMC7317083
OpenAlexW2980972660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.