Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618346›Full record

Trial reportRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva2019

Acute effects of ventilator hyperinflation with increased inspiratory time on respiratory mechanics: randomized crossover clinical trial.

Luciano Matos Chicayban

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05702411 (Air Stacking Technique For Pulmonary Reexpansion In The Ventilator After Expiratory Pause During Aspiration In Closed System), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05702411 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Air Stacking Technique For Pulmonary Reexpansion In The Ventilator After Expiratory Pause During Aspiration In Closed System

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Nossa Senhora da ConceicaoRan2021 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsCritical CareArmsAir Stacking Technique, No Air Stacking Technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luciano Matos ChicaybanLaboratório de Pesquisa em Fisioterapia Pneumofuncional e Intensiva, Institutos Superiores de Ensino do CENSA - Campos dos Goytacazes (RJ), Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-4165
Prefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of ventilator hyperinflation on respiratory mechanics.

methodsA randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted with 38 mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection. The order of the hyperinflation and control (without changes in the parameters) conditions was randomized. Hyperinflation was performed for 5 minutes in pressure-controlled ventilation mode, with progressive increases of 5cmH2O until a maximum pressure of 35cmH2O was reached, maintaining positive end expiratory pressure. After 35cmH2O was reached, the inspiratory time and respiratory rate were adjusted so that the inspiratory and expiratory flows reached baseline levels. Measurements of static compliance, total resistance and airway resistance, and peak expiratory flow were evaluated before the technique, immediately after the technique and after aspiration. Two-way analysis of variance for repeated measures was used with Tukey's post hoc test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsVentilator hyperinflation increased static compliance, which remained at the same level after aspiration (46.2 ± 14.8 versus 52.0 ± 14.9 versus 52.3 ± 16.0mL/cmH2O; p < 0.001). There was a transient increase in airway resistance (6.6 ± 3.6 versus 8.0 ± 5.5 versus 6.6 ± 3.5cmH2O/Ls-1; p < 0.001) and a transient reduction in peak expiratory flow (32.0 ± 16.0 versus 29.8 ± 14.8 versus 32.1 ± 15.3Lpm; p <0.05) immediately after the technique; these values returned to pretechnique levels after tracheal aspiration. There were no changes in the control condition, nor were hemodynamic alterations observed.

conclusionVentilator hyperinflation promoted increased compliance associated with a transient increase in airway resistance and peak expiratory flow, with reduction after aspiration.

Indexed as

InhalationRespiratory MechanicsVentilators, MechanicalAdultAgedAirway ResistanceCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31618346
PMCPMC7005952
OpenAlexW2980380763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.