Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618287›Full record

ReviewEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2020

Variables that influence the medical decision regarding Advance Directives and their impact on end-of-life care.

Larissa Mont'Alverne de Arruda, Kelline Paiva Bringel Abreu, Laryssa Braga Cavalcante Santana, Manuela Vasconcelos de Castro Sales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emergency department early mortality model for patients admitted after presenting to a tertiary medical center emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Communication, Shared Decision-making and Goals of Care in the ICU through Electronic Health Records: A Scoping Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Meaning of Words and Why They Matter During End-of-Life Conversations.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Larissa Mont'Alverne de ArrudaHospital Haroldo Juaçaba, Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1116-9357
Kelline Paiva Bringel AbreuInstituição Federal das Unimeds do Estado do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-4272
Laryssa Braga Cavalcante SantanaHospital de Messejana Dr. Carlos Alberto Studart Gomes, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-5273
Manuela Vasconcelos de Castro SalesHospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-9095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the variables that influence physicians to implement Advance Directives and assess their impact on end-of-life care. It is a narrative literature review of 25 articles published between 1997 and 2018, in the following databases: CAPES, EBSCOhost, BDTD, VHL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE®/PubMed. The keywords utilized were: "advance directives", "living wills", "physicians", "attitude", "decision making", "advance care planning". The main factors that influenced physicians to implemente the directives were patients prognosis, medical paternalism, and patients understanding of their medical condition. Respect for autonomy, lack of knowledge and experience with directives, legal concerns, family influence, cultural and religious factors also contributed to medical decision. Most studies (86%) showed that having a directive led to lower rates of invasive interventions in the last days of patient´s life. Physicians were interested in respecting their patients' autonomy and agreed that having an advance directive helped in the decision-making process; however, they stated other factors were also taken into account, mainly prognosis and reversibility conditions. Having directives contributed to reducing the use of life support therapies and adoption of comfort measures.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAdvance Directive AdherenceAdvance DirectivesAttitude of Health PersonnelDecision MakingHumansPaternalismPersonal AutonomyPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID31618287
PMCPMC6896595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.