Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with concurrent extra-cardiac vascular disease in the era of transradial coronary intervention: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Masaki Kodaira, Mitsuaki Sawano, Toshiki Kuno, Yohei Numasawa, Shigetaka Noma, Masahiro Suzuki, Shohei Imaeda, Ikuko Ueda, Keiichi Fukuda, Shun Kohsaka

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of extracardiac vascular disease on outcomes of 1.4 million patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
  2. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the polyvascular patient remains a high-risk procedure.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masaki KodairaDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7293-617X
Mitsuaki SawanoDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiki KunoDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Yohei NumasawaDepartment of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Shigetaka NomaDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Tochigi, Japan.
Masahiro SuzukiDepartment of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Shohei ImaedaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ikuko UedaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi FukudaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shun KohsakaDepartment of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtra-cardiac vascular diseases (ECVDs), such as cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD), are frequently observed among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it is not clear how these conditions affect patient outcomes in the era of transradial coronary intervention (TRI). METHODS AND

resultsAmong 7,980 patients with ACS whose data were extracted from the multicenter Japanese percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry between August 2008 and March 2017, 888 (11.1%) had one concurrent ECVD (either PAD [345 patients: 4.3%] or CVD [543 patients; 6.8%]), while 87 patients (1.1%) had both PAD and CVD. Overall, the presence of ECVD was associated with a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.728; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.183-2.524) and bleeding complications (OR: 1.430; 95% CI: 1.028-2.004). There was evidence of interaction between ECVD severity and procedural access site on bleeding complication on the additive scale (relative excess risk due to interaction: 0.669, 95% CI: -0.563-1.900) and on the multiplicative scale (OR: 2.105; 95% CI: 1.075-4.122). While the incidence of death among patients with ECVD remained constant during the study period, bleeding complications among patients with ECVD rapidly decreased from 2015 to 2017, in association with the increasing number of TRI.

conclusionsOverall, the presence of ECVD was a risk factor for adverse outcomes after PCI for ACS, both mortality and bleeding complications. In the most recent years, the incidence of bleeding complications among patients with ECVD decreased significantly coinciding with the rapid increase of TRI.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overCerebrovascular DisordersFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPeripheral Vascular DiseasesPostoperative HemorrhageRadial ArteryRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31618228
PMCPMC6795465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.