Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Financial inclusion and intimate partner violence: What does the evidence suggest?

Lotus McDougal, Jeni Klugman, Nabamallika Dehingia, Amruta Trivedi, Anita Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lotus McDougalCenter on Gender Equity and Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3002-0489
Jeni KlugmanGeorgetown Institute for Women, Peace and Security, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Nabamallika DehingiaCenter on Gender Equity and Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Amruta TrivediCenter on Gender Equity and Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Heath, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Financial inclusion is an area of growing global interest in women's empowerment policy and programming. While increased economic autonomy may be expected to reduce the prevalence of intimate partner violence, the mechanisms and contexts through which this relationship manifests are not well understood. This analysis aims to assess the relationship between women's financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence using nationally-representative data from 112 countries worldwide. Levels of both financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence varied substantially across countries (ranging from 2-100%, and 1-46%, respectively), and across regions. In multivariate global analyses, increased levels of women's financial inclusion were associated with lower levels of recent intimate partner violence after accounting for asset-based enablers of economic autonomy and gender norms; this relationship was lost upon the inclusion of measures of national context (i.e., development and fragility). These results underscore that the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence is complex, follows many pathways, and is affected by context. In low and middle income countries, asset-based enablers of economic autonomy, gender norms and national context explained much of the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence. In those low and middle income countries with high levels of controlling behavior by male spouses, financial inclusion was associated with higher levels of recent intimate partner violence. These findings further suggest that initiatives that aim to prevent intimate partner violence by way of increased economic autonomy may be ineffective in the absence of broader social change and support, and indeed, as seen in countries with higher levels of men's controlling behavior, backlash may increase the risk of violence. Efforts to improve women's financial inclusion need to recognize that its relationship with intimate partner violence is complex, and that it requires an enabling environment supportive of women's rights and autonomy.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMaleModels, TheoreticalPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID31618219
PMCPMC6795492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.