ArticleRadiation research2019
Comparison of Proteomic Biodosimetry Biomarkers Across Five Different Murine Strains.
Article in Radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Novel Proteomic Expression Profiles for Radiation Exposure in Male and Female C57BL6 Mice.Radiation research · 2024Article
- Serum amyloid A contributes to radiation-induced lung injury by activating macrophages through FPR2/Rac1/NF-κB pathway.International journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of miRNA Expression after Whole-Body Irradiation Across Three Strains of Mice.Radiation research · 2023Article
- Prediction of Total-Body and Partial-Body Exposures to Radiation Using Plasma Proteomic Expression Profiles.Radiation research · 2022Article
- Cross-platform validation of a mouse blood gene signature for quantitative reconstruction of radiation dose.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Novel Murine Biomarkers of Radiation Exposure Using An Aptamer-Based Proteomic Technology.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Proteomics of Non-human Primate Plasma after Partial-body Radiation with Minimal Bone Marrow Sparing.Health physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the event of a radiological or nuclear attack, advanced clinical countermeasures are needed for screening and medical management of the exposed population. Such a population will represent diverse heterogeneity in physiological response to radiation exposure. The current study seeks to compare the expression levels of five previously established proteomic biodosimetry biomarkers of radiation exposure, i.e., Flt3 ligand (FL), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), serum amyloid A (SAA), pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and fibrinogen (FGB), across multiple murine strains and to test a multivariate dose prediction model based on a single C57BL6 strain against other murine strains. Female mice from five different murine strains (C57BL6, BALB/c, C3H/HeJ, CD2F1 and outbred CD-1 mice) received a single whole-body dose of 1-8 Gy from a Pantak X-ray source at a dose rate of 3.59 Gy/min. Plasma was collected by cardiac puncture at days 1, 2, 3 and 7 postirradiation. Plasma protein levels were determined via commercially available ELISA assay. Significant differences were found between radiation-induced expression levels of FL, MMP9, SAA, PTX3 and FGB among the C57BL6, BALB/c, C3H/HeJ, CD2F1 and CD-1 strains (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.