Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31618097›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2019

Infants and Adults Use Visual Cues to Improve Detection and Discrimination of Speech in Noise.

Kaylah Lalonde, Lynne A Werner

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Does visual speech provide release from perceptual masking in children?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaylah LalondeDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Lynne A WernerDepartment of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Auditory Neuroscience Traning ProgramT32DC005361 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Adrian KC Lee, DAVID J PERKEL · 2002 to 2026
$8.8M
Development on Frequency Resolution in InfancyR01DC000396 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WERNER, LYNNE A. · 1989 to 2016
$5.4M
The interaction of auditory and visual detection, discrimination, and recognition in infants’ real-world listening environmentsF32DC015387 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LALONDE, KAYLAH L · 2016 to 2017
$47k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015387NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000396NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC005361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose This study assessed the extent to which 6- to 8.5-month-old infants and 18- to 30-year-old adults detect and discriminate auditory syllables in noise better in the presence of visual speech than in auditory-only conditions. In addition, we examined whether visual cues to the onset and offset of the auditory signal account for this benefit. Method Sixty infants and 24 adults were randomly assigned to speech detection or discrimination tasks and were tested using a modified observer-based psychoacoustic procedure. Each participant completed 1-3 conditions: auditory-only, with visual speech, and with a visual signal that only cued the onset and offset of the auditory syllable. Results Mixed linear modeling indicated that infants and adults benefited from visual speech on both tasks. Adults relied on the onset-offset cue for detection, but the same cue did not improve their discrimination. The onset-offset cue benefited infants for both detection and discrimination. Whereas the onset-offset cue improved detection similarly for infants and adults, the full visual speech signal benefited infants to a lesser extent than adults on the discrimination task. Conclusions These results suggest that infants' use of visual onset-offset cues is mature, but their ability to use more complex visual speech cues is still developing. Additional research is needed to explore differences in audiovisual enhancement (a) of speech discrimination across speech targets and (b) with increasingly complex tasks and stimuli.

Indexed as

Perceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInfantMaleNoisePhotic StimulationPsychoacousticsSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID31618097
PMCPMC7201336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.