Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617926›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Assessment of Sarcopenia Among Community-Dwelling At-Risk Frail Adults Aged 65 Years and Older Who Received Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yanxia Lu, Mathew Niti, Keng Bee Yap, Crystal Tze Ying Tan, Ma Shwe Zin Nyunt, Liang Feng, Boon Yeow Tan, Gribson Chan, Sue Anne Khoo, Sue Mei Chan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How Pragmatic Are Sarcopenia Intervention Studies? A Systematic Review.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevention of Sarcopenia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Yanxia LuSingapore Immunology Network, Biology of Ageing Laboratory, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis, Singapore.
Mathew NitiPerformance and Technology Assessment Department, Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Keng Bee YapGeriatric Medicine and Palliative Medicine Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Crystal Tze Ying TanSingapore Immunology Network, Biology of Ageing Laboratory, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis, Singapore.
Ma Shwe Zin NyuntGerontology Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Liang FengGerontology Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Boon Yeow TanMedical Services Department, St Luke's Hospital, Singapore.
Gribson ChanRehabilitation Services Division, St Luke's Hospital, Singapore.
Sue Anne KhooPsychological Medicine Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Sue Mei ChanNutrition and Dietetics Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Philip YapGeriatric Medicine Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore.
Anis LarbiSingapore Immunology Network, Biology of Ageing Laboratory, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Biopolis, Singapore.
Tze Pin NgGerontology Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSt Luke's Hospital · SGMinistry of Health · SGNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SGSingapore Immunology Network · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: There is little understanding of the outcomes associated with active lifestyle interventions for sarcopenia among older persons. Objective: To determine the association of 6-month multidomain lifestyle interventions (physical exercise, nutritional enhancement, cognitive training, combined treatment, and standard care) with change in sarcopenia status and physical function among adults 65 years and older. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc secondary analysis of a parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted from September 1, 2012, to September 1, 2014, at community centers providing services to elderly individuals in Singapore. Participants included a subsample of 92 community-dwelling prefrail or frail older persons with sarcopenia aged 65 years and older. Data were analyzed from June 1, 2017, to January 1, 2018. Interventions: The 5 intervention groups were a 6-month duration of physical exercise that included resistance and balance training, nutritional enhancement with a commercial oral nutrition supplement formula, cognitive training, a combination of the preceding 3 interventions, and standard care (control). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were changes in sarcopenia status and its components, appendicular skeletal muscle index (ASMI), knee extension strength (KES), and gait speed (GS) at 3 months and 6 months following the intervention. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of both low ASMI and low KES and/or GS. Results: In 92 participants with sarcopenia, the mean (SD) age was 70.0 (4.7) years and 59 (64.1%) were female. Seventy-eight participants received active interventions and 14 received standard care. Of 92 total participants, the number who remained sarcopenic was reduced to 48 (of 73) after 3 months and 51 (of 75) after 6 months of intervention, indicating that 25 of 92 participants (27.2%) experienced sarcopenia reduction at 3 months and 24 of 92 (26.1%) had sarcopenia reduction at 6 months. Low KES was present in 88 of 92 patients (95.6%), and low GS in 30 of 92 patients (32.6%) at baseline. Among the components of sarcopenia, GS had the greatest change associated with active interventions, with 22 of 30 participants (73.3%) free of low GS at 6 months; in comparison, 17 of 88 participants (19.3%) were free of low KES at 6 months and 7 of 92 participants (7.6%) were free of low ASMI at 6 months. Men experienced greater reduction in sarcopenia than women (χ2 = 5.925; P = .02), as did those with younger age (t = -2.078; P = .04) or higher ASMI (mean [SD] ASMI, 5.74 [0.77] vs 5.14 [0.77] kg/m2; P = .002). Participants in the active intervention group experienced statistically significant decreases in sarcopenia score and its components at 3 months and 6 months from baseline (F = 14.138; P < .001), but the intervention was not associated with significant differences in ASMI, KES, and GS vs standard care. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that older persons with sarcopenia are responsive to the effects of multidomain lifestyle interventions. Sarcopenia reduction was most pronounced through improved gait speed, and occurred more among those who were male, were younger, or had greater muscle mass.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsResistance TrainingAgedAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHealthy LifestyleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMuscle StrengthPhysical Functional PerformanceQuadriceps MuscleSarcopeniaSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID31617926
PMCPMC6806429
OpenAlexW2981222019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.