Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617639›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2020

Interoceptive attention in opioid and stimulant use disorder.

Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Rayus Kuplicki, Maria Puhl, T Investigators, Martin P Paulus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Initial Validation of a Behavioral Phenotyping Model for Substance Use Disorder.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L StewartLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0123-9438
Sahib S KhalsaLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Rayus KuplickiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Maria PuhlLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
T InvestigatorsLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research · USTulsa Community College · US

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Maëlle Camille Marie Gueguen · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
Neural Basis of Meal Related Interoceptive Dysfunction in Anorexia NervosaK23MH112949 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI KHALSA, SAHIB · 2017 to 2021
$994k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH112949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blunted anterior insula activation during interoceptive perturbations has been associated with stimulant (cocaine and amphetamine) use disorder (SUD) and is related to risk for and prognosis of SUD. However, little is known whether these interoceptive alterations extend to opioid use disorder (OUD). This exploratory study used the same experimental probe during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the hypothesis that SUD and OUD exhibit interoceptive discrepancies characterized by subjective ratings and activation within the insula. Recently, abstinent individuals diagnosed with current SUD (n = 40) or current OUD (n = 20) were compared with healthy individuals (CTL; n = 30) on brain and self-report responses during an interoceptive attention task known to elicit insula activation. Participants selectively attended to interoceptive (heartbeat and stomach) and exteroceptive signals during blood-oxygen-level-dependent fMRI recording. Groups and conditions were compared on (a) activation within probabilistic cytoarchitectonic segmentations of the insula and (b) self-reported stimulus intensity. First, SUD showed amplified ratings of heart-related sensations but attenuation of dorsal dysgranular insula activity relative to CTL. Amplified ratings were linked to drug use recency, while attenuation was normalized with greater past-year stimulant use. Second, SUD and OUD showed attenuation of dorsal dysgranular insula activity during attention to stomach sensations relative to CTL. Taken together, these results are consistent with altered neural processing of interoceptive signals in drug addiction, particularly as a function of SUD. Future studies will need to determine whether interoceptive metrics help to explain substance use disorder pathophysiology and are useful for predicting outcomes.

Indexed as

AttentionInteroceptionAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersCerebral CortexCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOpioid-Related DisordersYoung Adultcytoarchitectureinsulainteroceptionopioid use disorderstimulant use disorder

Identifiers

PMID31617639
PMCPMC7160014
OpenAlexW2981243357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.