Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617562›Full record

Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2020

Effect of Clinical Geriatric Assessments and Collaborative Medication Reviews by Geriatrician and Family Physician for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life in Home-Dwelling Older Patients Receiving Polypharmacy: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rita Romskaug, Eva Skovlund, Jørund Straand, Espen Molden, Hege Kersten, Kaisu H Pitkala, Christofer Lundqvist, Torgeir B Wyller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02379455 (Cooperation for Improved Pharmacotherapy in Home-dwelling Elderly People Receiving Polypharmacy - The COOP Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02379455 nacompletednot on this map

Cooperation for Improved Pharmacotherapy in Home-dwelling Elderly People Receiving Polypharmacy - The COOP Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2015 to 2017Enrolled192ConditionsDrug UsageArmsComprehensive drug review
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Health-related quality of life among older adults following acute hospitalization: longitudinal analysis of a randomized controlled trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. [Development, structure, and function of the GeriatrIMSS Institutional Model].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rita RomskaugInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eva SkovlundDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Jørund StraandInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen MoldenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hege KerstenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kaisu H PitkalaDepartment of General Practice, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Christofer LundqvistInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Torgeir B WyllerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOHelsinki University Hospital · FINorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Polypharmacy and inappropriate drug regimens are major health concerns among older adults. Various interventions focused on medication optimization strategies have been carried out, but the effect on patient-relevant outcomes remains uncertain. Objective: To investigate the effect of clinical geriatric assessments and collaborative medication reviews by geriatrician and family physician (FP) on health-related quality of life and other patient-relevant outcomes in home-dwelling older patients receiving polypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster randomized, single-blind, clinical trial. Norwegian FPs were recruited from March 17, 2015, to March 16, 2017, to participate in the trial with their eligible patients. Participants were home-dwelling patients 70 years or older, using at least 7 medications regularly, and having their medications administered by the home nursing service. Patients in the control group received usual care. Randomization occurred at the FP level. A modified intent-to-treat analysis was used. Intervention: The intervention consisted of 3 main parts: (1) clinical geriatric assessment of the patients combined with a thorough review of their medications; (2) a meeting between the geriatrician and the FP; and (3) clinical follow-up. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was health-related quality of life as assessed by the 15D instrument (score range, 0-1; higher scores indicate better quality of life, with a minimum clinically important change of ±0.015) at week 16. Secondary outcomes included changes in medication appropriateness, physical and cognitive functioning, use of health services, and mortality. Results: Among 174 patients (mean [SD] age, 83.3 [7.3] years; 67.8% women; 87 randomized to the intervention group and 87 randomized to the control [usual care] group) in 70 FP clusters (36 intervention and 34 control), 158 (90.8%) completed the trial. The mean (SD) 15D instrument score at baseline was 0.708 (0.121) in the intervention group and 0.714 (0.113) in the control group. At week 16, the mean (SD) 15D instrument score was 0.698 (0.164) in the intervention group and 0.655 (0.184) in the control group, with an estimated between-group difference of 0.045 (95% CI, 0.004-0.086; P = .03). Several secondary outcomes were also in favor of the intervention. There were more drug withdrawals, reduced dosages, and new drug regimens started in the intervention group. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings indicate that, among older patients exposed to polypharmacy, clinical geriatric assessments and collaborative medication reviews carried out by a geriatrician in cooperation with the patient's FP can result in positive effects on health-related quality of life. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02379455.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorGeriatric AssessmentGeriatriciansMedication Therapy ManagementPhysicians, FamilyPolypharmacyQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCognitionFemaleHealth Smart CardsHumansIndependent LivingMaleMortality

Identifiers

PMID31617562
PMCPMC6802420
OpenAlexW2981151994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.