Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617481›Full record

Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2019

Hospitalization and Intensive Therapy at the End of Life.

Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Anna Mikolajetz, Konrad Reinhart, Randall J Curtis, Ulrike Haase, Daniel Thomas-Rüddel, Ulf Dennler, Christiane S Hartog

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Dying in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Hemodynamic monitoring and volume management].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  11. [Relatives after a stay on the intensive care unit: a care gap to be closed].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. [The Trend in Places of Death Over Two Decades in the City of Muenster - an Observational Study Based on evaluated Death Certificates].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Observational
  14. End-of-life practices in 11 German intensive care units : Results from the ETHICUS-2 study.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Application of DRGs in hospital medical record management and its impact on service quality.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  20. [Communication in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekCenter for Sepsis Control and Care, University Hospital Jena; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Jena; BIH Guest Professorship/Charité Foundation, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin; Medical Controlling Division, Munich Hospital; Bavaria Hospital, Kreischa.
Anna Mikolajetz
Konrad Reinhart
Randall J Curtis
Ulrike Haase
Daniel Thomas-Rüddel
Ulf Dennler
Christiane S Hartog
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Washington · USMünchen Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGermany has more intensive care unit (ICU) beds per capita than the USA, but the utilization of these resources at the end of life is unknown.

methodsRetrospective observational study using nationwide German hospital discharge data (DRG statistics; DRG, diag- nosis-related groups) from 2007 to 2015. We investigated hospital deaths and use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations. Population-based incidences were standardized to the age and sex distribution of the German population.

resultsStandardized hospital admission rates increased by 0.8% annually (from 201.9 to 214.6 per 1000 population), while hospital admissions involving ICU care increased by 3.0% annually (from 6.5 to 8.2 per 1000 population). Among all deaths in the German population, the proportion of hospital deaths with ICU care increased by 2.3% annually (from 9.8% to 11.8%). Among all hospital deaths, the proportion involving ICU care increased by 2.8% annually from 20.6% (2007) to 25.6% (2015). In patients aged 65 and older, the use of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations increased 3 times faster than hospital deaths.

conclusionUse of intensive care services during terminal hospitalizations increased across all age groups, particularly the elderly. The increased need for end-of-life care in the ICU calls for improvements in educational, policy, and reimbursement strategies. It is unclear whether ICU care was appropriate and compliant with patient preferences.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAgedGermanyHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31617481
PMCPMC6832106
OpenAlexW2974826802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.