Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617336›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Digitalization versus immersion: performance and subjective evaluation of 3D perception with emulated accommodation and parallax in digital microsurgery.

Siegfried Wahl, Denitsa Dragneva, Katharina Rifai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siegfried WahlUniversity Eye Clinics, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Tuebingen, Germany.
Denitsa DragnevaUniversity Eye Clinics, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Tuebingen, Germany.
Katharina RifaiUniversity Eye Clinics, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the visually challenging situation of microsurgery with many altered depth cues, digitalization of surgical systems disrupts two further depth cues, namely focus and parallax. Although in purely optical surgical systems accommodation and eye movements induce expected focus and parallax changes, they become statically fixed through digitalization. Our study evaluates the impact of static focus and parallax onto performance and subjective 3D perception. Subjects reported decreased depth realism under static parallax and focus. Thus surgeons’ depth perception is impacted further through digitalization of microsurgery, increasing the potential of artificial stereo-induced fatigue.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMicrosurgeryAdultAsthenopiaDepth PerceptionEquipment DesignEye MovementsFixation, OcularHumansSurgeonsTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adultdepth perceptiondigitalizationmicrosurgerystereo images

Identifiers

PMID31617336
PMCPMC7000911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.