Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617292›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2020

Development of selected bacterial groups of the rectal microbiota of healthy calves during the first week postpartum.

K Schwaiger, J Storch, C Bauer, J Bauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K SchwaigerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Chair of Animal Hygiene, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5317-6892
J StorchDepartment of Animal Sciences, Chair of Animal Hygiene, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
C BauerDepartment of Quality Assurance and Analytics, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, Germany.
J BauerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Chair of Animal Hygiene, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

Funding

Bavarian Research FoundationTrouw Nutrition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe intestinal microbiota of newborn calves is largely unexplored even if it is of great significance for their future health. Therefore, the aim of the study was to gain a better insight into the development dynamics of certain bacterial groups during the first week of life. METHODS AND

resultsFaecal samples of healthy Simmental calves (dual-purpose breed; n = 80), bottle fed and raised in a dairy farm were taken immediately after birth and at 6/12/24/48/72/168 h (h) after birth. Samples were analysed using cultural, biochemical and molecular-biological methods. The aerobe, anaerobe, Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus counts of healthy calves increased significantly between 6 and 24 h postpartum (P <0·05). Apart from the anaerobes, bacterial counts decreased after reaching a plateau at 24-48 h. Enterococcus faecalis was detected in significantly higher counts compared to E. faecium (P <0·05). Lactobacilli developed more slowly and increased until day 7 after birth to a mean value of 6·8 × 10

conclusionsLactobacillus reuteri became the most common Lactobacillus sp. during the first week of life. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This fact seems to be very important for the calf's intestinal health because L. reuteri is known to show in vitro bactericidal effects against bacterial pathogens and anti-infective activities against rotaviruses and Cryptosporidium parvum.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCattleFecesFemaleIntestinesMalePhylogenyPostpartum PeriodAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalfEnterobacteriaceaeenterococcigut microbiotalactobacilliLactobacillus reuteri

Identifiers

PMID31617292
PMCPMC7166559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.