Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617168›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2019

Novel thyroxine formulations: a further step toward precision medicine.

Camilla Virili, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Marco Centanni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Myxedema Heart and Pseudotamponade.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Camilla ViriliDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-1950
Pierpaolo TrimboliThyroid Center and Nuclear Medicine, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2125-4937
Marco CentanniDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Latina, Italy. marco.centanni@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-1649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Levothyroxine (T4) is a critical-dose drug, because little variations in the blood concentration may cause treatment failure as well as iatrogenic thyrotoxicosis. Despite the dose response of this drug being more carefully titrated nowadays, several papers still report that a significant fraction of patients treated with levothyroxine demonstrate a TSH which is not on target. Moreover, some widespread gastrointestinal disorders as well as interfering drugs and foods may cause the "refractoriness" of a significant number of patients to an expected dose of thyroxine. The increasing awareness of the mechanisms interfering with the oral thyroid hormone bioavailability and the body of evidence regarding the complexity of treatment in certain classes of patients prompted pharmaceutical research to identify new hormonal formulations to optimize the performance of this drug. In this brief review, the progression of the scientific knowledge of novel T4 formulations use has been analyzed.

Indexed as

Dosage FormsHumansPrecision MedicineThyroxineDosage FormsThyroxineDrugs dissolutionGastrointestinal disordersLiquid levothyroxineSoftgel thyroxineThyroxine absorptionThyroxine malabsorption

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.