ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020
Usefulness of Controlled Attenuation Parameter in Detecting and Monitoring Hepatic Steatosis with MRI-PDFF as Reference.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prospective study of quantitative liver MRI in cystic fibrosis: feasibility and comparison to PUSH cohort ultrasound.Pediatric radiology · 2023Trial
- Recent advances in the treatment of chronic liver diseases: focus on MASLD/MASH-related fibrosis.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2026Review
- Assessment of liver stiffness and steatosis in patients with intestinal failure: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Improving the accuracy of fatty liver index to reflect liver fat content with predictive regression modelling.PloS one · 2022Article
- Ultrasound Elastography-Cornerstone of Non-Invasive Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Steatosis grading consistency between controlled attenuation parameter and MRI-PDFF in monitoring metabolic associated fatty liver disease.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2021Article
- Comparison between magnetic resonance and ultrasound-derived indicators of hepatic steatosis in a pooled NAFLD cohort.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControlled attenuation parameter (CAP) has been developed to estimate the extent of hepatic steatosis.
aimsThe purpose was to evaluate the usefulness of CAP in assessing hepatic steatosis and its change using magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as reference standard.
methodsConsecutive patients with liver steatosis were enrolled prospectively. We assessed hepatic steatosis with CAP and MRI-PDFF at enrollment and 12-month follow-up. The correlations between the two methods were analyzed. With MRI-PDFF as reference, the performance of CAP in diagnosis of steatosis severity and its changes was assessed.
resultsA total of 50 patients were enrolled, and 45 of them had follow-up MRI-PDFF and CAP at a median interval of 399 days. The mean hepatic steatosis was 13.4% by MRI-PDFF and 291.6 dB/m by CAP. There were positive correlations between CAP and MRI-PDFF in steatosis severity and its change. The median value of CAP was 254, 301.5, and 329.5 dB/m for steatosis < 10%, 10-20%, and > 20%, respectively. For CAP in detecting steatosis ≥ 10% and > 20%, the diagnostic performance was 0.821 and 0.814. With the cutoff of 275 dB/m for ≥ 10% steatosis, the positive predictive value was 84.8%. With the cutoff of 325 dB/m for > 20% steatosis, the negative predictive value was 91.9%. In multiple linear regression, one dB/m change by CAP was associated with 0.039% change by MRI-PDFF.
conclusionsIn assessing liver fat content, CAP correlated with MRI-PDFF and was useful for detection and monitoring of hepatic steatosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.