Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617092›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

"Caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the superior mesenteric artery for the treatment of right colon cancer: is it more in line with the principle of oncology?

Xiaojiang Yi, Hongming Li, Xinquan Lu, Jin Wan, Dechang Diao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of apical lymph node metastasis in right colon cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaojiang YiDepartment of Colorectal (Tumor) Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hongming LiDepartment of Colorectal (Tumor) Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xinquan LuDepartment of Colorectal (Tumor) Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jin WanDepartment of Colorectal (Tumor) Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Dechang DiaoDepartment of Colorectal (Tumor) Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. diaodechang223@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-4571
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the feasibility and application value of a "caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for the treatment of right colon cancer

methodsClinical data consisting of 168 right colon cancer cases under going laparoscopic D3 radical resection, including 84 cases of "caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the SMA (CC + SMA group) and 84 cases of conventional medial approach plus dissection around the superior mesenteric vein (MA + SMV group), from January 2017 to March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. For CC + SMA group, our surgical method was to isolate the mesocolon using a caudal-to-cranial pathway and ligate blood vessels along the midline of the SMA.

resultsThe baseline data was not significantly different between the two groups (all p > 0.05). The mean operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the CC + SMA and the MA + SMV groups were 170.04 ± 43.10 versus 172.33 ± 41.84 min and 91.07 ± 55.12 versus 77.38 ± 40.21 ml, respectively, which has no significant difference (p > 0.05). The mean number of total and positive harvested lymph nodes in the two groups were 29.44 ± 5.90 versus 26.21 ± 6.64 (p < 0.05) and 2.57 ± 1.93 versus 2.51 ± 1.05, respectively (p > 0.05). Compared with the MA + SMV group, there was no significant difference in total postoperative complication rate in the CC + SMA group. The time to pull out drainage tube in the CC + SMA group was longer than MA + SMV group (4.05 ± 1.79 versus 3.38 ± 1.99 day; p = 0.022).

conclusionIt is safe and feasible for the "caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the SMA in right colon cancer. It may have some advantages in the number of lymph nodes dissection, and the long-term prognosis remains to be expected.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionAgedColonic NeoplasmsDrainageFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMesenteric Artery, SuperiorMesenteric VeinsMiddle AgedOperative TimePrognosisRetrospective StudiesArtery firstCaudal-to-cranialRight colon cancerSuperior mesenteric artery

Identifiers

PMID31617092
OpenAlexW2980949818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.