Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617088›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Is robotic right colectomy economically sustainable? a multicentre retrospective comparative study and cost analysis.

Giovanni Merola, Antonio Sciuto, Felice Pirozzi, Jacopo Andreuccetti, Giusto Pignata, Francesco Corcione, Marco Milone, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Rossana Castaldo, Leandro Pecchia and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Robotic hernia repair: the trainee "Drag" factor-a single-surgeon 9-year experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni MerolaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgical Endoscopy, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3237-677X
Antonio SciutoDepartment of General Surgery, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3234-4580
Felice PirozziDepartment of General Surgery, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6385-5394
Jacopo AndreuccettiDepartment of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, San Camillo Hospital of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-9775
Giusto PignataDepartment of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, San Camillo Hospital of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2381-1055
Francesco CorcioneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgical Endoscopy, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7157-5157
Marco MiloneDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgical Endoscopy, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5612-1926
Giovanni Domenico De PalmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgical Endoscopy, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7474-7180
Rossana CastaldoSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4143-1678
Leandro PecchiaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7900-5415
Graziano CeccarelliDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7859-6815
Umberto BracaleDepartment of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Surgical Endoscopy, University Hospital Federico II of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. umbertobracale@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-0889
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Warwick · GBAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITOspedale di Spoleto · ITOspedale Santa Maria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the Food and Drug Administration approval, robot-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more acceptance among surgeons. One of the open issues about robotic surgery is the economic sustainability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the economic sustainability of robotic as compared to laparoscopic right colectomy for the Italian National Health System.

methodsWe performed a retrospective multicentre case-matched study including 94 patients for each group from four different Italian surgical departments. An economic evaluation gathered from a real-world data was performed to assess the sustainability of the robotic approach for right colectomy in the Italian National Health System. In particular, a differential cost analysis between the two procedures was performed.

resultsNo statistical differences were found between the two groups for postoperative outcomes. After a careful review of the literature on the cost assessment for the operative room, medical devices and hospital stay according with our data, we estimated the followings: (a) the mean operative room cost for robotic group was 2179 ± 476 € vs. 1376 ± 322 € for laparoscopic group; (b) the mean hospital stay cost for robotic group was 3143 ± 1435 € vs. 3292 ± 1123 € for laparoscopic group; and (c) the mean cost for instruments was 6280 € for robotic group vs. 1504 € for laparoscopic group. The total mean cost of robotic right colectomy was 11,576 ± 1915 € vs. 6196 ± 1444 € for laparoscopic right colectomy.

conclusionIn conclusion, to date, robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis does not provide any significant clinical advantages, which may justify the additional costs, as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart. Further evolution of robotic technology and experience may lead to a reduction of costs, especially if the robotic platform is used in an appropriate healthcare setting.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyFemaleHumansItalyLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CareRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresCost analysisLaparoscopic surgeryReal-world dataRight colectomyRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31617088
OpenAlexW2980377278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.