Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31617032›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2019

Quantum-like behavior without quantum physics III : Logic and memory.

Stephen Selesnick, Gualtiero Piccinini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephen SelesnickDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Missouri - St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA. selesnick@mindspring.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2599-3040
Gualtiero PiccininiDepartment of Philosophy, Center for Neurodynamics, University of Missouri - St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63121, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We employ some of the machinery developed in previous work to investigate the inferential and memory functions of quantum-like neural networks. We set up a logical apparatus to implement this in the form of a Gentzen sequent calculus which codifies some of the combinatory rules for the state spaces of the neuronal networks introduced earlier. We discuss memory storage in this context and along the way find formal proof that synchronicity promotes binding and storage. These results lead to an algorithmic fragment in calculus that simulates the memory function known as pattern completion. This claim is tested by noting that the failure of certain steps in the algorithm leads to memory deficits essentially identical to those found in such pathologies as Alzheimer's dementia, schizophrenia, and certain forms of autism. Moreover, a specific "power-of-two" wiring architecture and computational logic, which have been postulated and observed across many brain circuits, emerge spontaneously from our model. We draw conclusions concerning the possible nature of such mental processes qua computations.

Indexed as

LogicMemoryModels, NeurologicalQuantum TheoryNerve NetMemoryNetworksPattern completionSequent calculusStorageSynchronicityTsien’s power-of-two law

Identifiers

PMID31617032
PMCPMC6917691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.