Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31616965›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2019

Neoadjuvant cisplatin and paclitaxel modulate tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients with cervical cancer.

A Marijne Heeren, Iske F van Luijk, Joost Lakeman, Noëlle Pocorni, Jeroen Kole, Renée X de Menezes, Gemma G Kenter, Tjalling Bosse, Cornelis D de Kroon, Ekaterina S Jordanova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Advances in immunotherapy for cervical cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Immunotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Are We Ready for Prime Time?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

A Marijne HeerenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4158-6058
Iske F van LuijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost LakemanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Noëlle PocorniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen KoleLaboratory for Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renée X de MenezesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gemma G KenterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-3918
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-8437
Cornelis D de KroonDepartment of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ekaterina S JordanovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.jordanova@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-1322

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding VU2013-6015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to chemotherapy is widely recognized as one of the major factors limiting therapeutic efficacy and influences clinical outcomes in patients with cancer. Many studies on various tumor types have focused on combining standard-of-care chemotherapy with immunotherapy. However, for cervical cancer, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on the local immune microenvironment is largely unexplored. We performed a pilot study on 13 primary cervical tumor samples, before and after NACT, to phenotype and enumerate tumor-infiltrating T-cell subpopulations using multiplex immunohistochemistry (CD3, CD8, FoxP3, Ki67, and Tbet) and automated co-expression analysis software. A significant decrease in proliferating (Ki67

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelPilot ProjectsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCisplatinPaclitaxelCervical cancerCisplatinNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPaclitaxelT cellsTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID31616965
PMCPMC6851216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.