ReviewJournal of experimental botany2019
Comparative genomics can provide new insights into the evolutionary mechanisms and gene function in CAM plants.
Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering Crassulacean Acid Metabolism in CCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- Bringing CAM photosynthesis to the table: Paving the way for resilient and productive agricultural systems in a changing climate.Plant communications · 2024Review
- Reconciling continuous and discrete models of C4 and CAM evolution.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- The diverse diaspora of CAM: a pole-to-pole sketch.Annals of botany · 2023Review
- The CAM lineages of planet Earth.Annals of botany · 2023Article
- Elastic and collapsible: current understanding of cell walls in succulent plants.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Review
- Article
- CAM Models: Lessons and Implications for CAM Evolution.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Systems biology for crop improvement.The plant genome · 2021Review
- Biological Parts for Plant Biodesign to Enhance Land-Based Carbon Dioxide Removal.Biodesign research · 2021Review
- Biosystems Design to Accelerate CBiodesign research · 2020Review
- Editorial: Systems Biology and Synthetic Biology in Relation to Drought Tolerance or Avoidance in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- New perspectives on crassulacean acid metabolism biology.Journal of experimental botany · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthesis is an important biological innovation enabling plant adaptation to hot and dry environments. CAM plants feature high water-use efficiency, with potential for sustainable crop production under water-limited conditions. A deep understanding of CAM-related gene function and molecular evolution of CAM plants is critical for exploiting the potential of engineering CAM into C3 crops to enhance crop production on semi-arid or marginal agricultural lands. With the newly emerging genomics resources for multiple CAM species, progress has been made in comparative genomics studies on the molecular basis and subsequently on the evolution of CAM. Here, recent advances in CAM comparative genomics research in constitutive and facultative CAM plants are reviewed, with a focus on the analyses of DNA/protein sequences and gene expression to provide new insights into the path and driving force of CAM evolution and to identify candidate genes involved in CAM-related biological processes. Potential applications of new computational and experimental technologies (e.g. CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome-editing technology) to the comparative and evolutionary genomics research on CAM plants are offered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.