Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31616704›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2019

Endoscopic mucosal resection of a bile duct polyp: A case report.

Shu Yang, Li Yang, Xiang-Yang Wang, Yu-Ming Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Direct transpapillary resection of a left hepatic duct polyp.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shu YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China.
Li YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China.
Xiang-Yang WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China.
Yu-Ming YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410011, Hunan Province, China. akm762mm@163.com.
Hunan Normal University · CNCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBile duct polyps are difficult to diagnose and are usually excised by open abdominal surgery or snare polypectomy using choledochoscopy CASE SUMMARY: A 63-year-old woman was hospitalized following epigastric pain lasting a month. She had a 30-year history of cholelithiasis and had undergone cholecystectomy because of cholecystolithiasis, and had undergone cholangiolithotomy twice due to choledocholithiasis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging showed a communication between the bile duct and duodenal bulb. Inside the communication, CT showed a high-density shadow which was a hypointense lesion in T2 weighted image. The lesion showed no enhancement in T1 weighted image contrast enhanced. Gastroscopy revealed an incarcerated bile duct stone in the anterior wall of the duodenal bulb, which was removed with a basket under gastroscopy. Thereafter, a choledochoduodenal fistula was revealed. Finally, a flat polyp was detected in the lower part of the common bile duct and was removed by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) through the fistula. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the removal of a bile duct polyp using EMR.

conclusionEMR is a safe, effective, and low-cost method for the resection of all bile duct polyps.

Indexed as

Bile duct polypCase reportCholangiolithiasisEndoscopic mucosal resection

Identifiers

PMID31616704
PMCPMC6789407
OpenAlexW2976966068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.